- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:47:31 +0200
- To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- CC: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote: > ... >> Separately, as an editorial comment, as listed directly above, I'd like >> to see a big s/resource/resource representation/g (or just >> s/resource/representation/g as the resource is what is identified by the >> URI, not the bag-o-bits returned in an HTTP response. I have some other >> editorial comments too, but those will have to wait until I have time to >> write them down. > > A resource is a bag of bits. I would object to this change. Mark is correct. Please use terminology consistent with other IETF specs. BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 13 June 2009 08:48:15 UTC