- From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
- Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2009 01:06:40 -0700
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@messagingarchitects.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com> wrote: > There's no justification for allowing video@src or audio@src to be > sniffed. It just opens the door to more problems, and is not supported > by the justification of backward-compatibility with deployed content -- > is there any other justification, besides someone "sort of expect"ing > it? I've removed all mention of audio or video sniffing (previously, there was a sniffing rule for MP3s). Because the algorithm default to not sniffing, this has the effect you requested. Adam
Received on Friday, 5 June 2009 08:07:38 UTC