Friday, 30 August 2002
- Re: Business Goals and CSFs / F2F topics
- RE: Business Goals and CSFs / F2F topics
- Re: FW: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wid e Web"
- Business Goals and CSFs
- FW: First public WD of "Architectural Principles of the World Wid e Web"
- RE: Proposal for D-AC017 (Business Functions)
- Broader layering issue [Re: Message exchange patterns in the architecture]
- Re: Proposal for D-AC017 (Business Functions)
- RE: Proposal for D-AC017 (Business Functions)
- Message exchange patterns in the architecture
- Arch doc comments; SOAP and WSDL as protocols
Thursday, 29 August 2002
- RE: Proposal for D-AC017 (Business Functions)
- RE: Reliable messaging
- RE: Reliable messaging
- Re: Reliable messaging
- RE: Reliable messaging
- RE: Reliable messaging
- IRC minutes of 8/29/2002 telecon (RAW)
- RE: Reliable messaging
- Re: Reliable messaging
- RE: Reliable messaging
- RE: Reliable messaging
- RE: Reliable messaging
- RE: Reliable messaging
- Re: Reliable messaging
- Proposal for D-AC017 (Business Functions)
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017
- Reliable messaging
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017
- RE: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- Re: Routing and choreography
- RE: Routing and choreography
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017
- Re: Routing and choreography
Wednesday, 28 August 2002
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017
- Re: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017
Tuesday, 27 August 2002
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017
- Re: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements? / D-AC017
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements?
Monday, 26 August 2002
Sunday, 25 August 2002
Thursday, 22 August 2002
- Regrets for 9/5 teleconference
- Status of AG006 - "web friendly"
- Status of AG002
- Status of AG007
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements?
- Re: Champions for Draft-status requirements?
- RE: Champions for Draft-status requirements?
- Champions for Draft-status requirements?
Wednesday, 21 August 2002
- Re: "hypertext"
- Re: "hypertext"
- Re: "hypertext"
- Re: "hypertext"
- Re: "hypertext"
- Re: "hypertext"
- "hypertext"
- Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- RE: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
Tuesday, 20 August 2002
- RE: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- RE: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- RE: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- RE: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- Re: Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- Proposal re REST and Arch doc
- WSA Requirements doc published as a second working draft
Monday, 19 August 2002
- RE: Reliable Messaging: Division of Responsibilities (was RE: RES T, Conversations and Reliability)
- Re: Reliable Messaging: Division of Responsibilities (was RE: RES T, Conversations and Reliability)
- Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability
Saturday, 17 August 2002
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- "Loose Coupling" (was: Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability)
Friday, 16 August 2002
- Re: More definitions / models of collaboration and orchestration to look at?
- RE: More definitions / models of collaboration and orchestration to look at?
- More definitions / models of collaboration and orchestration to look at?
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- D-AC017 - Business Functions Requirement / Reliable Messaging
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- Re: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
Thursday, 15 August 2002
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- Fw: [wsi_wsbasic] RE: Call-back scenario
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: Reliable Messaging: Division of Responsibilities (was RE: RES T, Conversations and Reliability)
- Re: FW: [wsi_wsbasic] RE: Call-back scenario
- FW: [wsi_wsbasic] RE: Call-back scenario
- "Application Development" article on web services architectures
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- Re: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- Re: Choreography and REST
Wednesday, 14 August 2002
- Regrets from Joe
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- Re: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- Re: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: Choreography and REST
- RE: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- Re: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
Sunday, 4 August 2002
Wednesday, 14 August 2002
- Re: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- RE: "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
Tuesday, 13 August 2002
- Re: Priorities
- RE: Choreography and REST
- "Orchestration" and "Choreography"
- Re: Choreography and REST
- "Coordination" and "Choreography"
- A hitchhiker's guide to the recent STF related contexts [WAS RE: Priorities]
- RE: Priorities
- RE: Choreography and REST
- Priorities
- Making progress
- Never Mind Previous Post
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- RE: Web service definition
- FW: LC Issue 331 closed
- RE: Web service definition
Monday, 12 August 2002
Tuesday, 13 August 2002
Monday, 12 August 2002
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: RDF isn't so hot
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: RDF isn't so hot
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- RDF isn't so hot
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- RE: Web service definition
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
Sunday, 11 August 2002
- Re: Transactions
- RE: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Transactions
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Web service definition
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Web service definition
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Choreography and REST
- RE: Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
Saturday, 10 August 2002
- Choreography and the Semantic Web
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Summary of what we already know
- Re: Choreography and REST
- soap-RP
Friday, 9 August 2002
Saturday, 10 August 2002
- Defining coordination/orchestration/choreography/
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
Friday, 9 August 2002
- ANN: BPEL4WS, WS-Transaction and WS-Coordination specifications published
- RE: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- RE: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- Re: Choreography and REST
- RE: Reliable Messaging: Division of Responsibilities (was RE: RES T, Conversations and Reliability)
- Choreography and REST
- RE: (WSCI) Submission Request
- FW: Announcement: Acknowledgment of Web Service Choreography Int erface (WSCI) Submission Request
- Re: Reliable Messaging: Division of Responsibilities (was RE: RES T, Conversations and Reliability)
Thursday, 8 August 2002
- [STF] Security Harvesting
- RE: Reliable Messaging: Division of Responsibilities (was RE: RES T, Conversations and Reliability)
- RE: Reliable Messaging: Division of Responsibilities (was RE: RES T, Conversations and Reliability)
- Re: Reliable Messaging: Division of Responsibilities (was RE: REST, C onversations and Reliability)
- Reliable Messaging: Division of Responsibilities (was RE: REST, C onversations and Reliability)
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- FW: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
Wednesday, 7 August 2002
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: Comments on proposed requirements
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: [STF] Additional security usage scenarios - More comments
- RE: [STF] Additional security usage scenarios - More comments
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Next steps for harvesting
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Harvesting summary
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Suggestions for telcon agenda?
- Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Re: Stateless comms in the WSA
- RE: Stateless comms in the WSA
Tuesday, 6 August 2002
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: Stateless comms in the WSA
- Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- RE: Stateless comms in the WSA
- RE: Stateless comms in the WSA
- Re: Security Question
- RE: REST, Conversations and Reliability
- Re: Stateless comms in the WSA
- RE: Security Question
- Re: Stateless comms in the WSA
- RE: [BOF or Workshop] Web services Security BOF or Workshop
- RE: Security Question
- Stateless comms in the WSA
- RE: Security Question
- RE: Security Question
- [BOF or Workshop] Web services Security BOF or Workshop
- RE: Security Question
- RE: Security Question
- RE: Security Question
- RE: Security Question
- RE: Security Question
- RE: Security Question
- Re: Security Question
- RE: Security Question
- [STF] STF Unofficial Concall Minutes 8/5/02
Monday, 5 August 2002
- RE: Security Question
- RE: Security Question
- Re: Security Question
- RE: Security Question
- RE: Security Question -XML Schema Default Attribute handling
- RE: Security Question
- RE: Security Question
- Security Question
- RE: [STF] Additional security usage scenarios - comments on firew all usage scenario
- RE: [STF] Additional security usage scenarios - comments on firew all usage scenario
- RE: [STF] WS Sec Group Scoping
Friday, 2 August 2002
- RE: [STF] WS Sec Group Scoping
- RE: [STF] WS Sec Group Scoping
- Re: A viewpoint on harvesting REST
- ACM XML Security Conference 22 November Fairfax VA
Thursday, 1 August 2002
- Re: WSDL and REST
- FW: XMLP WG Issue 342 Resolution
- Re: Do RESTifarians want anything from the WSA that they don't al ready have?
- RE: Do RESTifarians want anything from the WSA that they don't al ready have?
- Re: FW: LC issue 330 closed
- FW: XMLP Issue 340 Closed
- Re: Do RESTifarians want anything from the WSA that they don't already have?
- Re: A viewpoint on harvesting REST
- Do RESTifarians want anything from the WSA that they don't alread y have?
- RE: A viewpoint on harvesting REST
- OMA overview
- FW: LC issue 330 closed
- Re: A viewpoint on harvesting REST
- RE: A viewpoint on harvesting REST
- RE: A viewpoint on harvesting REST
- FW: XMLP Issue 332 Resolution
- Re: A viewpoint on harvesting REST