- From: Dave Hollander <dmh@contivo.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 08:52:46 -0700
- To: "'www-ws-arch@w3.org'" <www-ws-arch@w3.org>
I just spent over an hour catching up on WG email (from the weekend only) and see no discussion of specific frameworks or proposals that we need to cover in the WSA document. In fact I now see a long chain on the definition of web services when that is not on the work agenda for the WG. It will not come again unless there is a large majority who can not accept the current wording in the requirements document. This concerns me. I did not join this WG to have an open discussion forum, these are available elsewhere. I do not have time to wade through hours of reading to try to find the few messages that advance the work of the WG. Each email sent to this forum requires time and attention from each and every member. This should be viewed as an obligation to respect their time by being concise, clear and aligned with the groups' stated objectives. Can we please try to focus the discussion on active work items! Regards, Dave Hollander co-chair W3C Web Services Architecture Working Group
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 11:55:49 UTC