- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 08:15:35 -0400
- To: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Paul Prescod wrote: <snip/> > I claim that if Web Services people presumed a writable Web was > available to all services, and thought throough the implications of > that, the idea of a choreography language would not even occur to us. > CORBA obviously is not REST but I would be curious to hear whether CORBA > people feel they need a "choreography language". If so, I'm no familiar > with it. Why isn't this a central part of CORBA? Because CORBA presumes > a shared writable (object) information space. <snip/> Actually, the OMG (aka CORBA people) do feel they need a "choreography language". It's called EDOC[1]. It is needed for many of the same reasons as Geoff cites in one of his responses to this thread (e.g. the trend towards public v private semantics). Cheers, Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com phone: +1 508 234 3624 [1] http://www.dstc.edu.au/Research/Projects/EDOC/submission1.pdf
Received on Sunday, 11 August 2002 08:34:19 UTC