- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 12:32:35 -0400
- To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, www-ws-arch@w3.org
Christopher B Ferris wrote: > > You need to drill down a bit further than the one-sentence description > > of EDOC. > > I never claimed that EDOC-the-whole-thing is exclusively JUST about > choreography of process and hence can be equated to WSCI at some > level. > However, business process is at the heart of what is needed to model > enterprise > distributed computing. I agree that business process is key as a problem domain. We are talking about the specific technology of choreography specifications. I do not feel that these are proper *technical solutions* to the *business problem* of business process description. Merely correlating client and server states in a state machine only solves the part of the problem that you *cause* if you refuse to make those states explicit on the wire and in URI-addressable resources. If you design the service so that states are explicit and addressable then you are freed to concentrate on the larger problems (as it seems EDOC is). -- "When I walk on the floor for the final execution, I'll wear a denim suit. I'll walk in there like Willie Nelson, John Wayne, Will Smith -- Men in Black -- James Brown. Maybe do a Michael Jackson moonwalk." Congressman James Traficant.
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 12:35:07 UTC