- From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2002 09:23:59 -0400
- To: Geoff Arnold <Geoff.Arnold@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org, www-ws-arch-request@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 09:25:08 UTC
Works for me. Christopher Ferris Architect, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com phone: +1 508 234 3624 www-ws-arch-request@w3.org wrote on 08/13/2002 09:21:29 AM: > > On Tuesday, August 13, 2002, at 02:29 AM, Krishna Sankar wrote: > > Agreed, artifact might not be *THE* scientific term. By XML > > artifacts, one could mean DTD or Schema or WSDL (which itself is an XML > > fragment or ... - "stuff" might be the most nearest non-scientific > > term. > > Well, I think I'd prefer "documents" to "stuff". However, > why do we need another noun in there at all? Why not simply: > > Definition: > A Web service is a software application identified by a URI, whose > interfaces and bindings are defined and described using XML. Its > definition can be discovered by other software applications. These > applications may then interact with the Web service in a manner > prescribed by its definition, using XML messages conveyed by > internet protocols. >
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2002 09:25:08 UTC