W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-ws-arch@w3.org > August 2002

Re: REST, Conversations and Reliability

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2002 21:54:52 -0400
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
Message-ID: <20020806215452.R30575@www.markbaker.ca>

On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 03:48:34PM -0700, David Orchard wrote:
> But I'll decline the challenge to show proof of something that I'm hoping
> we're going to create.  I understand that you think we've tried and failed,
> but I think we have some new technology - like the web URIs, XML, SOAP,
> WSDL - as well as past experience that will help us.  And I think we can use
> these technologies in ways that loosely couple reliability to application
> semantics.

I just wanted to point out that some aspect of a reliability solution
may be reusable in a loosely coupled manner.  For example, message ids.
But a complete SOAP based reliability solution cannot be.

BTW, I just found this, a better description of the infamous "A Note on
Distributed Computing" paper than the paper itself provides (by Jim
Waldo, of course);

  "In particular, we argued that distributed infrastructures must
   present a model of partial failure to the programmer, since only at
   the application level can such failure be dealt with; must deal with
   concurrency issues, rather than leaving them to the infrastructure;
   and must at the application level realize what parts of the program
   are local and what parts are at least potentially remote."

Mark Baker, CTO, Idokorro Mobile (formerly Planetfred)
Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA.               distobj@acm.org
http://www.markbaker.ca        http://www.idokorro.com
Received on Tuesday, 6 August 2002 21:54:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:05:36 UTC