- From: Geoff Arnold <Geoff.Arnold@Sun.COM>
- Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2002 13:48:55 -0400
- To: "Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler)" <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com>
- Cc: www-ws-arch@w3.org
On Wednesday, August 28, 2002, at 01:06 PM, Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) wrote: > One of the solutions to this problem, I think, is to > define reliable messaging a bit more accurately, for example by > replacing > terms like "reliably exchange" (below) with something like "reduce the > uncertainty of the message transmission to a practically acceptable > level". The phrase "practically acceptable level" seems to be inviting trouble. Why not simply talk about measurable reliability levels (i.e. QoS)? Curious, Geoff
Received on Wednesday, 28 August 2002 13:48:56 UTC