Re: Champions for Draft-status requirements?

* Cutler, Roger (RogerCutler) <RogerCutler@ChevronTexaco.com> [2002-08-22 12:40-0700]
> Basically I'm willing to let it go and it seems to me that the sense of the
> group is moving this way, with the exception that I am REALLY opposed to
> letting go completely the subject of reliable messaging.  If D-AC017 went
> away there would be no mention of reliable messaging whatever in the
> requirements, and I think that this would be very inappropriate given the
> level of interest and priority that is widely put on this subject.  So I am
> basically proposing getting rid of D-AC017 but adding something specifically
> about reliable messaging.

Doesn't AC018, with its fairly large umbrella, cover reliable
messaging?

Regards,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/