User agent
Review Implementation Report
User Agent FTF update
CANCELLED: W3C User Agent Teleconference 27 September
css?Fw: Pauses revisited -- New HTML tags needed?
Rescheduling W3C User Agent FTF Meeting
Flash question
Raw minutes from 20 September UAWG teleconference
RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 20 September 2001
AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 20 September 2001
[Article] W3C Advances Accessibility Standard (Internet News)
[Article] "Standards body pushes accessibility online" (CNET)
aol and implementation?
UAAG 1.0 advances to Candidate Recommendation
UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
special notice:
Updated Implementation Report
CANCELED: UAWG ftf meeting in Redmond
I won't be in attendance.
regrets due to national emergency:
Participating in face-to-face meeting by phone
f2f regrets
What do I loose if I don't get plug ins in ie any more?
Raw minutes from 6 Sep 2001 UAWG teleconf
Updated FTF meeting
User Agent Accessibility Guidelines
RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 6 September 2001
AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 6 September 2001
access key and ua conflict:
FrontPage --ruining accessibility even when the author has good intent
Update implementation report
[Fwd: Request to advance UAAG 1.0 to Candidate Recommendation status]
[Fwd: Responses to Mark Novak issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0]
[Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement
- Re: [Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement
- Re: [Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement
- Re: [Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement
Raw minutes from 30 August 2001 UAWG teleconf (Agreement to request CR)
Tentative FTF meeting agenda available
IMPORTANT: Attendance at 30 August teleconf important to discuss advancement to Candidate Recommendation
RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 30 August 2001
AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 30 August 2001
Update implementation report
candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links
MINUTES: W3C User Agent Teleconference 23 August 2001
Re: DOM 3 Events comments
DOM Level 3 Events updated
interesting note:Fw: Re: discontiguous selection
User Agent Telecon starts in 5 minutes
REMINDER: W3C User Agent Telecon starts 1 hour earlier
RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 23 August 2001
AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 23 Thursday 2001 (NOTE: meets one hour earlier)
alt tag repair:
User Agent Teleconference: Meet one hour earlier this week (Response Required)
GNOME Accessibility BOF at LinuxWorld 2001 on August 28th - Invitation to Participate! (fwd)
editorial: implementation report disclaimer
Raw Minutes: W3C User Agent Teleconference 16 AUgust 2001
Updated implementation report
Raw minutes for 9 August 2001 UAWG teleconf
User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 16 August 2001
AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 16 August 2001
Draft Initial implementation report partially available
DTD and Example file for implmentation report generation tool
PrismaBrowser: self-voicing/low vision browser
EARL draft primer
AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 9 August 2001
Update on W3C/WAI mailing lists
ION Launches Accessibility Reader Application - Press Release
static option for time-independent action opportunites
Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
Update to formal response to SVG WG (UAAG 1.0 last call)
31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
A Rare Moment!
DOMLib: tiny cross-UA DHTML API provides compatibility with W3C DOM
Raw minutes of 26 July UAWG teleconference
Re: Tooltips on element focus
[Issue 516] Is ordered rendering required to satisfy checkpoint 2.4?
[Agenda] 26 July UAWG teleconference
Fw: Freedom Box is out and ready for purchase!
Fw: AOL Looking for Accessibility Testers
[Fwd: Responses to AOL issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0]
The use of the term "conventional selection resource"
[PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoints 10.2 and 10.4 to system color, text decoration and border styling capabilities
[PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.1 to system font size capabilities
[PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.2 to system font family capabilities
[PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.3 to system color capabilities
Raw minutes from 19 July 2001 UAWG teleconference
RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 19 July 2001
Definition: Operating Environment
AGENDA: W3C User Agent Telecon 19 July 2001
Definition of text decoration
!important
Action item: Techniques for addressing cross-platform accessibility solutions
Action item: Techniques for addressing cross-platform accessibility solutions
Formal responses to issues raised by SVG WG during last call of UAAG 1.0
[Published] 14 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques
Fw: new talking web browser
Raw minutes from 12 July teleconf
Action Item: URL for Web Access Gateway Presentation
Your response SVG group's response to UA Guide
Re: Issue 516: [...] summary review
giving the user the last word
Adding agenda item
[comment] SVG responses C.9 Checkpoints 6.1 and 6.2: DOM shouldn't be required for UAs that don't support scripting.
[Comment] SVG response C.1. Too many Priority 1 checkpoints
RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 12 July 2001
AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 12 July 2001
Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0
Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0
Issue 517: Agree with Ian's Proposal
Issue 516: Checkpoint 2.4: Checkpoint doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0
- Re: Issue 516: Checkpoint 2.4: Checkpoint doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0
- Re: Issue 516: Checkpoint 2.4: Checkpoint doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0
Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Re: Netscape accessibility plan on-line (fwd)
Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
6 July draft of UAAG 1.0 summary available
Impact matrix broken in 22 June draft
access mozilla:
An interesting browser
Responses to SVG WG updated
RE: [Clarification] Checkpoint 6.5 (alert of changes to content) does not apply to style changes
RE: [Clarification] How operating environment requirements apply for embedded operating environments (e.g., Java in Windows)
[Proposal] Since content focus and user interface focus are required, make characteristics normative
[Clarification] Checkpoint 6.5 (alert of changes to content) does not apply to style changes
[Clarification] How operating environment requirements apply for embedded operating environments (e.g., Java in Windows)
Responses to RealNetworks issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
CANCELLED: W3C User Agent
Re: Checkpoint labels: "For content" and "For rendered content"
Responses to Opera issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 I
Responses to HTML WG issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Responses to Sun issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Responses to Adobe issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Re: [Proposal] Re: Should we have a teleconference 5 July?
Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Responses to Mark Novak issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Responses to AOL issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
[Proposal] Checkpoint 10.4 highlight requirement and image maps
[Issue 517] Proposal to address nested time containers.
- RE: [Issue 517] Proposal to address nested time containers.
- Re: [Issue 517] Proposal to address nested time containers.
[Proposal] Edits to text about speech output limitations.
- Re: [Proposal] Edits to text about speech output limitations.
- Re: [Proposal] Edits to text about speech output limitations.
UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46
- RE: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46
- Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46
- Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46