- From: gregory j. rosmaita <oedipus@hicom.net>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 12:45:35 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- cc: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>, Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
JRG: I guess it comes down to whether the working group trusts developers
to pick an usable lower limit or the user agent guidelines requiring a
lower limit in many cases that is clearly not usable by anyone (e.g. 1
point). I really don't think any user agent developer who wants people to
use their technology would hardwire the largest size font size for a
particular font family.
IJ: I agree that that is unlikely.
GJR: unlikely, but not unimaginable... however, since stranger
implementation decisions have been made in the past and continue to be
made as we type, in the interest of moving UAAG forward, i vote to curtail
further discussion on the topic and to leave checkpoint 4.1 unaltered --
especially in light of the feedback obtained from people in the
internationalization working and interest groups...
ontologically, gregory.
-----------------------------------------------------
He that lives upon Hope, dies Farting.
Benjamin Franklin, Poor Richard's Almanack, 1736
-----------------------------------------------------
oedipus@hicom.net
http://www.hicom.net/~oedipus/index.html
-----------------------------------------------------
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 12:45:46 UTC