- From: Ian B. Jacobs <ij@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 09:43:32 -0400
- To: w3c-svg-wg@w3.org
- CC: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Dear SVG WG, On 14 July, I sent the formal response [1] of the UAWG to your last call comments about the User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0. I mentioned that the UAWG had not yet resolved on issue. We have since resolved issue 516 [2]: "Checkpoint 2.4 doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0." Based on discussions with Dean Jackson, Jon Ferraiolo, and Chris Lilley, the UAWG modified the checkpoint so that a conforming user agent is not required to pause a presentation in order to satisfy the checkpoint. The revised checkpoint makes it clearer that the goal is time-independent access to the various outcomes available to users. Pausing the presentation automatically is one technique for achieving this goal. Dean Jackson and I have also discussed ways to implement this checkpoint and have asked developers of SVG players for their assistance in demonstrating useful ways to satisfy 2.4 for SVG. The 31 July 2001 draft of UAAG 1.0 [3] incorporates some changes that relate to issues raised by the SVG WG, and you are welcome to review it as you prepare your replies to our comments. Thank you for your continued assistance. We look forward to hearing from you soon. _ Ian [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-svg-wg/2001JulSep/0157.html [2] http://server.rehab.uiuc.edu/ua-issues/issues-linear-lc3.html#516 [3] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/WD-UAAG10-20010731/ -- Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs Cell: +1 917 450-8783
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2001 09:45:51 UTC