RE: 6 July draft of UAAG 1.0 summary available

Nicely done!

I had some confusion with scenario 1 Keyboard accessibility.
Mr. Jones using HTML to submit article to online journal seems more of an
authoring tool scenario and distantly related to User Agent accessibility.
Perhaps,

Mr. Jones, a reporter for an on-line journal, makes extensive use of the WWW
to conduct research for articles and features.

would make it more relevant to User Agent.

Jim Allan, Webmaster & Statewide Technical Support Specialist
Texas School for the Blind and Visually Impaired
1100 W. 45th St., Austin, Texas 78756
voice 512.206.9315    fax: 512.206.9264  http://www.tsbvi.edu/
"I see the Earth. It is so beautiful."--
first words spoken by human in space.
[Yuri Alekseevich Gagarin, from the Vostok 1, April 12, 1961.]


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-ua-request@w3.org]On
Behalf Of Ian B. Jacobs
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 3:14 PM
To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Subject: 6 July draft of UAAG 1.0 summary available


Hello,

Based on Working Group comments about the version of the
UAAG 1.0 summary that appeared in the ERCIM Newsletter [2],
I have published a revision of the summary [1] for your review.
This revision includes three accessibility scenarios, in order for
a physical disability, deafness, and blindness. It also includes
fewer examples of the (boring <grin>) checkpoints and guidelines.

Comments welcome,

 _ Ian


[1] http://www.w3.org/WAI/UA/2001/07/uaag10-summary-20010706
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-wai-ua/2001JulSep/0005
--
Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org)   http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs
Cell:                    +1 917 450-8783

Received on Friday, 6 July 2001 17:36:04 UTC