Wednesday, 26 September 2001
Tuesday, 25 September 2001
- Review Implementation Report
- User Agent FTF update
- CANCELLED: W3C User Agent Teleconference 27 September
- css?Fw: Pauses revisited -- New HTML tags needed?
Friday, 21 September 2001
Thursday, 20 September 2001
Wednesday, 19 September 2001
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 20 September 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 20 September 2001
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Tuesday, 18 September 2001
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- [Article] W3C Advances Accessibility Standard (Internet News)
Monday, 17 September 2001
Friday, 14 September 2001
- Re: aol and implementation?
- Re: aol and implementation?
- aol and implementation?
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Thursday, 13 September 2001
- UAAG 1.0 advances to Candidate Recommendation
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Wednesday, 12 September 2001
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
- Meeting postponed, not canceled [Was: CANCELED: UAWG ftf meeting in Redmond]
- UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.)
Tuesday, 11 September 2001
- special notice:
- Updated Implementation Report
- CANCELED: UAWG ftf meeting in Redmond
- Re: Updated FTF meeting
- I won't be in attendance.
- regrets due to national emergency:
Monday, 10 September 2001
Thursday, 6 September 2001
- What do I loose if I don't get plug ins in ie any more?
- Raw minutes from 6 Sep 2001 UAWG teleconf
- Re: Updated FTF meeting
- RE: Updated FTF meeting
- Updated FTF meeting
- User Agent Accessibility Guidelines
Wednesday, 5 September 2001
- Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 6 September 2001
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 6 September 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 6 September 2001
Tuesday, 4 September 2001
- Go to CR
- access key and ua conflict:
- FrontPage --ruining accessibility even when the author has good intent
Monday, 3 September 2001
Friday, 31 August 2001
- [Fwd: Request to advance UAAG 1.0 to Candidate Recommendation status]
- Re: Raw minutes from 30 August 2001 UAWG teleconf (Agreement to request CR)
- [Fwd: Responses to Mark Novak issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0]
Thursday, 30 August 2001
- Re: [Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement
- Re: [Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement
- Re: [Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement
- [Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement
- Re: Tentative FTF meeting agenda available
- Raw minutes from 30 August 2001 UAWG teleconf (Agreement to request CR)
- Tentative FTF meeting agenda available
- IMPORTANT: Attendance at 30 August teleconf important to discuss advancement to Candidate Recommendation
Wednesday, 29 August 2001
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 30 August 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 30 August 2001
Monday, 27 August 2001
- Re: candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links
- Re: Update implementation report
- Re: candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links
- Re: Update implementation report
- Update implementation report
- Re: candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links
- Re: candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links
- candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links
- MINUTES: W3C User Agent Teleconference 23 August 2001
Friday, 24 August 2001
Thursday, 23 August 2001
- DOM Level 3 Events updated
- interesting note:Fw: Re: discontiguous selection
- User Agent Telecon starts in 5 minutes
- Re: alt tag repair:
- REMINDER: W3C User Agent Telecon starts 1 hour earlier
- Re: alt tag repair:
Wednesday, 22 August 2001
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 23 August 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 23 Thursday 2001 (NOTE: meets one hour earlier)
- alt tag repair:
Tuesday, 21 August 2001
- User Agent Teleconference: Meet one hour earlier this week (Response Required)
- GNOME Accessibility BOF at LinuxWorld 2001 on August 28th - Invitation to Participate! (fwd)
Saturday, 18 August 2001
Thursday, 16 August 2001
- Re: Raw Minutes: W3C User Agent Teleconference 16 AUgust 2001
- Raw Minutes: W3C User Agent Teleconference 16 AUgust 2001
- Updated implementation report
- Re: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0
Thursday, 9 August 2001
Monday, 13 August 2001
Wednesday, 15 August 2001
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 16 August 2001
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 16 August 2001
- Draft Initial implementation report partially available
Friday, 10 August 2001
Thursday, 9 August 2001
- PrismaBrowser: self-voicing/low vision browser
- EARL draft primer
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 9 August 2001
- Update on W3C/WAI mailing lists
Monday, 6 August 2001
Friday, 3 August 2001
Thursday, 2 August 2001
- ION Launches Accessibility Reader Application - Press Release
- static option for time-independent action opportunites
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
- Re: Responses to TantekÇelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG1.0
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
- Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
- Re: 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Wednesday, 1 August 2001
- Is this a Job for SVG and WAI?
- Re: 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- Re: 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
Tuesday, 31 July 2001
- Update to formal response to SVG WG (UAAG 1.0 last call)
- Re: 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
- 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available
Monday, 30 July 2001
Friday, 27 July 2001
Thursday, 26 July 2001
- DOMLib: tiny cross-UA DHTML API provides compatibility with W3C DOM
- Raw minutes of 26 July UAWG teleconference
- Re: Tooltips on element focus
- RE: [Issue 516] Is ordered rendering required to satisfy checkpoint 2.4?
Wednesday, 25 July 2001
Monday, 23 July 2001
- [Agenda] 26 July UAWG teleconference
- Fw: Freedom Box is out and ready for purchase!
- Fw: AOL Looking for Accessibility Testers
- [Fwd: Responses to AOL issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0]
Sunday, 22 July 2001
Friday, 20 July 2001
- The use of the term "conventional selection resource"
- [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoints 10.2 and 10.4 to system color, text decoration and border styling capabilities
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.2 to system font family capabilities
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.1 to system font size capabilities
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.3 to system color capabilities
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.2 to system font family capabilities
- [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.1 to system font size capabilities
- [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.2 to system font family capabilities
- [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.3 to system color capabilities
Thursday, 19 July 2001
- Re: Responses to RealNetworks issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Raw minutes from 19 July 2001 UAWG teleconference
- Re: Responses to HTML WG issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Wednesday, 18 July 2001
- Re: HTTP USER-AGENT header question
- Re: Definition: Operating Environment
- Re: Definition: Operating Environment
- Re: Definition: Operating Environment
- RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 19 July 2001
- Re: Definition: Operating Environment
- Definition: Operating Environment
- AGENDA: W3C User Agent Telecon 19 July 2001
- Definition of text decoration
- Re: HTTP USER-AGENT header question
- HTTP USER-AGENT header question
Tuesday, 17 July 2001
Monday, 16 July 2001
Sunday, 15 July 2001
- Action item: Techniques for addressing cross-platform accessibility solutions
- Action item: Techniques for addressing cross-platform accessibility solutions
Saturday, 14 July 2001
- Formal responses to issues raised by SVG WG during last call of UAAG 1.0
- [Published] 14 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques
Friday, 13 July 2001
- Re: Responses to Opera issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 I
- Fw: new talking web browser
Thursday, 12 July 2001
- Raw minutes from 12 July teleconf
- Action Item: URL for Web Access Gateway Presentation
- Your response SVG group's response to UA Guide
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Issue 517 recap
- Re: Issue 516: [...] summary review
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1 Configure text size.
- Re: Responses to Opera issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 I
- Re: Issue 516: [...] summary review
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- RE: giving the user the last word
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- giving the user the last word
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1 Configure text size.
Wednesday, 11 July 2001
- Re: Responses to Opera issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 I
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- RE: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
- Adding agenda item
- [comment] SVG responses C.9 Checkpoints 6.1 and 6.2: DOM shouldn't be required for UAs that don't support scripting.
- [Comment] SVG response C.1. Too many Priority 1 checkpoints
- [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size.
Tuesday, 10 July 2001
Wednesday, 11 July 2001
- Re: access mozilla:
- Re: Issue 516: Checkpoint 2.4: Checkpoint doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0
- Re: Issue 516: Checkpoint 2.4: Checkpoint doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0
- Re: Issue 516: Checkpoint 2.4: Checkpoint doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0
- Re: [Issue 517] Proposal to address nested time containers.
Tuesday, 10 July 2001
Monday, 9 July 2001
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Sun issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Issue 517: Agree with Ian's Proposal
- Re: Responses to Sun issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Issue 516: Checkpoint 2.4: Checkpoint doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: Netscape accessibility plan on-line (fwd)
- Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Friday, 6 July 2001
- RE: 6 July draft of UAAG 1.0 summary available
- 6 July draft of UAAG 1.0 summary available
- Impact matrix broken in 22 June draft
- Re: access mozilla:
- access mozilla:
- Re: [Clarification] Checkpoint 6.5 (alert of changes to content) does not apply to style changes
- An interesting browser
Thursday, 5 July 2001
- Re: [Proposal] Edits to text about speech output limitations.
- RE: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46
- RE: [Clarification] How operating environment requirements apply forembedded operating environments (e.g., Java in Windows)
- Responses to SVG WG updated
- RE: [Clarification] Checkpoint 6.5 (alert of changes to content) does not apply to style changes
- RE: [Clarification] How operating environment requirements apply for embedded operating environments (e.g., Java in Windows)
- [Proposal] Since content focus and user interface focus are required, make characteristics normative
- [Clarification] Checkpoint 6.5 (alert of changes to content) does not apply to style changes
- [Clarification] How operating environment requirements apply for embedded operating environments (e.g., Java in Windows)
- Responses to RealNetworks issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46
- CANCELLED: W3C User Agent
- Re: Checkpoint labels: "For content" and "For rendered content"
- Responses to Opera issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 I
- Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46
- Responses to HTML WG issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to Sun issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46
- Responses to Adobe issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Re: [Proposal] Re: Should we have a teleconference 5 July?
- Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46
Wednesday, 4 July 2001
- RE: [Proposal] Checkpoint 10.4 highlight requirement and image maps
- RE: [Issue 517] Proposal to address nested time containers.
- Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- Responses to Mark Novak issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
Tuesday, 3 July 2001
- Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46
- Responses to AOL issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0
- [Proposal] Checkpoint 10.4 highlight requirement and image maps
- [Issue 517] Proposal to address nested time containers.
- Re: [Proposal] Edits to text about speech output limitations.
- [Proposal] Edits to text about speech output limitations.
- RE: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46
- UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46
- RE: Reviewer Comments: Last Call Version of the UAAG 1.0
- Re: Reviewer Comments: Last Call Version of the UAAG 1.0