- From: David Poehlman <poehlman1@home.com>
- Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:19:50 -0400
- To: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org>, "Al Gilman" <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
jaws for windows already allows for this. you can have "same page" links announced from within the html options of the configuration for the way jaws verbalizes information. A problem though is that often, for some reason, when the page is repositioned, we are placed at the top of the page rather than nearby the information targeted by the link. Rather than target this exclusively at assistive technologies, it would be a good idea for all uas to provide this information in some fashion. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Al Gilman" <asgilman@iamdigex.net> To: <w3c-wai-ua@w3.org> Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 11:17 AM Subject: candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links It is currently the prevalent practice that assitive technologies announce hyperlinks. Before reading link text, they say 'link' or give some other pro forma cue that what is about to be said constitutes a link. For example, in authoring one advises against making the alt text for an image link start with "link to" because it is so likely that the assistive technology will already have identified the link by saying 'link.' There is confusion quite frequently in browsing with screen readers when one follows an internal link, a link to a destination in the same page one is coming from. This is a minority occurrence; that is to say most often links load an new page. In this case, the page you wind up on is the same page you came from, and scrolling, top of page, etc. commands will get you there and back as well as hyperlink following. The candidate technique is that the assistive technologies should make this distinction, and announce "internal link" or some equivalent phrase such as "local link" for links where the value of the HREF attribute begins with the hash symbol '#' indicating an internal link. Please see http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/wai-tech-comments/2001Aug/0004.html for a recent example of users mention the confusion that arrises under the common practice of having internal links that lead to a place where the link text is identical to where they came from. Confusion on following internal links is a recurring report; this is by no means the first time I have heard this. I don't think we can cure this in the authoring, and the fix is straightforward in the User Agent. Even when the link text is not repeated verbatim, the 'visited links' information makes internal links and links directed to specific points in the page confusing in speech if this distinction is not made. Note how in the list-of-links auxiliary view, Lynx handles links with #fragment clauses on them differently from references that take you to the page root. Al
Received on Monday, 27 August 2001 11:20:16 UTC