w3c-wai-ua@w3.org from July to September 2001 by author

Aaron Leventhal

• Re: access mozilla: (Wednesday, 11 July)

Aaron Smith

• Re: Information about screen reader support for HTML elements/attributes? (Monday, 2 July)

Al Gilman

• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Re: candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links (Monday, 27 August)
• candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: alt tag repair: (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? (Saturday, 18 August)
• static option for time-independent action opportunites (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Tooltips on element focus (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: HTTP USER-AGENT header question (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Issue 517 recap (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: Issue 516: [...] summary review (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Thursday, 12 July)
• giving the user the last word (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1 Configure text size. (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: Issue 516: Checkpoint 2.4: Checkpoint doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0 (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: Issue 516: Checkpoint 2.4: Checkpoint doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0 (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [Issue 517] Proposal to address nested time containers. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46 (Thursday, 5 July)

Charles McCathieNevile

• Re: css?Fw: Pauses revisited -- New HTML tags needed? (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Re: Flash question (Thursday, 20 September)
• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: Update implementation report (Monday, 27 August)
• GNOME Accessibility BOF at LinuxWorld 2001 on August 28th - Invitation to Participate! (fwd) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Tooltips on element focus (Friday, 27 July)
• Re: HTTP USER-AGENT header question (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: Issue 516: Checkpoint 2.4: Checkpoint doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0 (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: Netscape accessibility plan on-line (fwd) (Monday, 9 July)
• An interesting browser (Friday, 6 July)

David Poehlman

• css?Fw: Pauses revisited -- New HTML tags needed? (Tuesday, 25 September)
• aol and implementation? (Friday, 14 September)
• special notice: (Tuesday, 11 September)
• regrets due to national emergency: (Tuesday, 11 September)
• What do I loose if I don't get plug ins in ie any more? (Thursday, 6 September)
• access key and ua conflict: (Tuesday, 4 September)
• Re: [Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: candidate AT technique: announce _internal_ links (Monday, 27 August)
• interesting note:Fw: Re: discontiguous selection (Thursday, 23 August)
• Re: alt tag repair: (Thursday, 23 August)
• alt tag repair: (Wednesday, 22 August)
• Re: Raw Minutes: W3C User Agent Teleconference 16 AUgust 2001 (Thursday, 16 August)
• ION Launches Accessibility Reader Application - Press Release (Thursday, 2 August)
• Fw: Freedom Box is out and ready for purchase! (Monday, 23 July)
• Fw: AOL Looking for Accessibility Testers (Monday, 23 July)
• Fw: new talking web browser (Friday, 13 July)
• access mozilla: (Friday, 6 July)
• Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46 (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46 (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46 (Tuesday, 3 July)
• Re: [Proposal] Edits to text about speech output limitations. (Tuesday, 3 July)

Denis Anson

• RE: [Issue 516] Is ordered rendering required to satisfy checkpoint 2.4? (Thursday, 26 July)
• RE: giving the user the last word (Thursday, 12 July)
• RE: [Proposal] Checkpoint 10.4 highlight requirement and image maps (Wednesday, 4 July)
• RE: [Issue 517] Proposal to address nested time containers. (Wednesday, 4 July)
• RE: [Proposal] Re: Should we have a teleconference 5 July? (Monday, 2 July)

earl johnson

• Re: Responses to Sun issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)

gregory j. rosmaita

• Re: aol and implementation? (Friday, 14 September)
• f2f regrets (Monday, 10 September)
• editorial: implementation report disclaimer (Saturday, 18 August)
• PrismaBrowser: self-voicing/low vision browser (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? (Friday, 3 August)
• DOMLib: tiny cross-UA DHTML API provides compatibility with W3C DOM (Thursday, 26 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.1 to system font size capabilities (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.3 to system color capabilities (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.2 to system font family capabilities (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)

Hansen, Eric

• RE: [Clarification] Checkpoint 6.5 (alert of changes to content) does not apply to style changes (Thursday, 5 July)
• RE: [Clarification] How operating environment requirements apply for embedded operating environments (e.g., Java in Windows) (Thursday, 5 July)
• RE: Reviewer Comments: Last Call Version of the UAAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 3 July)

Harvey Bingham

• Go to CR (Tuesday, 4 September)

Harvey Bingham

• User Agent Accessibility Guidelines (Thursday, 6 September)
• EARL draft primer (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46 (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: [Proposal] Re: Should we have a teleconference 5 July? (Thursday, 5 July)

Ian B. Jacobs

• Raw minutes from 20 September UAWG teleconference (Thursday, 20 September)
• [Article] W3C Advances Accessibility Standard (Internet News) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• [Article] "Standards body pushes accessibility online" (CNET) (Monday, 17 September)
• UAAG 1.0 advances to Candidate Recommendation (Thursday, 13 September)
• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Wednesday, 12 September)
• Meeting postponed, not canceled [Was: CANCELED: UAWG ftf meeting in Redmond] (Wednesday, 12 September)
• CANCELED: UAWG ftf meeting in Redmond (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Participating in face-to-face meeting by phone (Monday, 10 September)
• Raw minutes from 6 Sep 2001 UAWG teleconf (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: Updated FTF meeting (Thursday, 6 September)
• Re: AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 6 September 2001 (Wednesday, 5 September)
• [Fwd: Request to advance UAAG 1.0 to Candidate Recommendation status] (Friday, 31 August)
• [Fwd: Responses to Mark Novak issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0] (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: [Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement (Thursday, 30 August)
• [Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement (Thursday, 30 August)
• Raw minutes from 30 August 2001 UAWG teleconf (Agreement to request CR) (Thursday, 30 August)
• IMPORTANT: Attendance at 30 August teleconf important to discuss advancement to Candidate Recommendation (Thursday, 30 August)
• Re: Update implementation report (Monday, 27 August)
• Re: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (Thursday, 16 August)
• Raw minutes for 9 August 2001 UAWG teleconf (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: Responses to TantekÇelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG1.0 (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Wednesday, 1 August)
• Update to formal response to SVG WG (UAAG 1.0 last call) (Tuesday, 31 July)
• Re: 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Tuesday, 31 July)
• 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Tuesday, 31 July)
• Raw minutes of 26 July UAWG teleconference (Thursday, 26 July)
• [Issue 516] Is ordered rendering required to satisfy checkpoint 2.4? (Wednesday, 25 July)
• [Agenda] 26 July UAWG teleconference (Monday, 23 July)
• [Fwd: Responses to AOL issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0] (Monday, 23 July)
• Raw minutes from 19 July 2001 UAWG teleconference (Thursday, 19 July)
• Re: Definition: Operating Environment (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: Definition: Operating Environment (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Formal responses to issues raised by SVG WG during last call of UAAG 1.0 (Saturday, 14 July)
• [Published] 14 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques (Saturday, 14 July)
• Re: Responses to Opera issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 I (Friday, 13 July)
• Raw minutes from 12 July teleconf (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• 6 July draft of UAAG 1.0 summary available (Friday, 6 July)
• Impact matrix broken in 22 June draft (Friday, 6 July)
• Re: access mozilla: (Friday, 6 July)
• Responses to SVG WG updated (Thursday, 5 July)
• [Proposal] Since content focus and user interface focus are required, make characteristics normative (Thursday, 5 July)
• [Clarification] Checkpoint 6.5 (alert of changes to content) does not apply to style changes (Thursday, 5 July)
• [Clarification] How operating environment requirements apply for embedded operating environments (e.g., Java in Windows) (Thursday, 5 July)
• Responses to RealNetworks issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 5 July)
• Responses to Opera issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 I (Thursday, 5 July)
• Responses to HTML WG issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 5 July)
• Responses to Sun issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 5 July)
• Responses to Adobe issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 5 July)
• Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Wednesday, 4 July)
• Responses to Mark Novak issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Wednesday, 4 July)
• Responses to AOL issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 3 July)
• [Proposal] Checkpoint 10.4 highlight requirement and image maps (Tuesday, 3 July)
• [Issue 517] Proposal to address nested time containers. (Tuesday, 3 July)
• [Proposal] Edits to text about speech output limitations. (Tuesday, 3 July)
• UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46 (Tuesday, 3 July)
• Re: Reviewer Comments: Last Call Version of the UAAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 3 July)
• Raw minutes from 28 June UAWG teleconf (Monday, 2 July)

Jill Thomas

• I won't be in attendance. (Tuesday, 11 September)

Jim Allan

• RE: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Thursday, 12 July)
• RE: 6 July draft of UAAG 1.0 summary available (Friday, 6 July)
• RE: [Clarification] How operating environment requirements apply forembedded operating environments (e.g., Java in Windows) (Thursday, 5 July)
• RE: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46 (Tuesday, 3 July)

Jim Ley

• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Wednesday, 12 September)

joanna88y@yahoo.com

• A Rare Moment! (Monday, 30 July)

Joel Sanda

• RE: !important (Tuesday, 17 July)
• RE: !important (Tuesday, 17 July)

Jon Ferraiolo

• Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? (Monday, 6 August)
• Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? (Thursday, 2 August)
• Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? (Wednesday, 1 August)

Jon Gunderson

• Re: User agent (Wednesday, 26 September)
• Review Implementation Report (Tuesday, 25 September)
• User Agent FTF update (Tuesday, 25 September)
• CANCELLED: W3C User Agent Teleconference 27 September (Tuesday, 25 September)
• Rescheduling W3C User Agent FTF Meeting (Friday, 21 September)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 20 September 2001 (Wednesday, 19 September)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 20 September 2001 (Wednesday, 19 September)
• Re: aol and implementation? (Friday, 14 September)
• Updated Implementation Report (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Updated FTF meeting (Thursday, 6 September)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 6 September 2001 (Wednesday, 5 September)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 6 September 2001 (Wednesday, 5 September)
• Update implementation report (Monday, 3 September)
• Tentative FTF meeting agenda available (Thursday, 30 August)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 30 August 2001 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 30 August 2001 (Wednesday, 29 August)
• Update implementation report (Monday, 27 August)
• MINUTES: W3C User Agent Teleconference 23 August 2001 (Monday, 27 August)
• User Agent Telecon starts in 5 minutes (Thursday, 23 August)
• REMINDER: W3C User Agent Telecon starts 1 hour earlier (Thursday, 23 August)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 23 August 2001 (Wednesday, 22 August)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 23 Thursday 2001 (NOTE: meets one hour earlier) (Wednesday, 22 August)
• User Agent Teleconference: Meet one hour earlier this week (Response Required) (Tuesday, 21 August)
• Raw Minutes: W3C User Agent Teleconference 16 AUgust 2001 (Thursday, 16 August)
• Updated implementation report (Thursday, 16 August)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 16 August 2001 (Wednesday, 15 August)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 16 August 2001 (Wednesday, 15 August)
• Draft Initial implementation report partially available (Wednesday, 15 August)
• DTD and Example file for implmentation report generation tool (Friday, 10 August)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 9 August 2001 (Thursday, 9 August)
• Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: Is this a Job for SVG and WAI? (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Thursday, 2 August)
• Re: 31 July 2001 UAAG 1.0 Guidelines and Techniques available (Wednesday, 1 August)
• The use of the term "conventional selection resource" (Friday, 20 July)
• [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoints 10.2 and 10.4 to system color, text decoration and border styling capabilities (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.2 to system font family capabilities (Friday, 20 July)
• [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.1 to system font size capabilities (Friday, 20 July)
• [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.2 to system font family capabilities (Friday, 20 July)
• [PROPOSAL] Revision to the wording for the reference in checkpoint 4.3 to system color capabilities (Friday, 20 July)
• Re: Definition: Operating Environment (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: Definition: Operating Environment (Wednesday, 18 July)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 19 July 2001 (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Definition: Operating Environment (Wednesday, 18 July)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Telecon 19 July 2001 (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Definition of text decoration (Wednesday, 18 July)
• Re: !important (Tuesday, 17 July)
• Re: Issue 516: [...] summary review (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1 Configure text size. (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: Responses to Opera issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 I (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Adding agenda item (Wednesday, 11 July)
• [comment] SVG responses C.9 Checkpoints 6.1 and 6.2: DOM shouldn't be required for UAs that don't support scripting. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• [Comment] SVG response C.1. Too many Priority 1 checkpoints (Wednesday, 11 July)
• [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• RSVP: W3C User Agent Teleconference 12 July 2001 (Tuesday, 10 July)
• AGENDA: W3C User Agent Teleconference 12 July 2001 (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Sun issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Issue 517: Agree with Ian's Proposal (Monday, 9 July)
• Issue 516: Checkpoint 2.4: Checkpoint doesn't make sense for SMIL 2.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: [Clarification] Checkpoint 6.5 (alert of changes to content) does not apply to style changes (Friday, 6 July)
• Re: [Proposal] Edits to text about speech output limitations. (Thursday, 5 July)
• RE: UAAG 1.0 in ERCIM newsletter #46 (Thursday, 5 July)
• CANCELLED: W3C User Agent (Thursday, 5 July)
• Re: Checkpoint labels: "For content" and "For rendered content" (Thursday, 5 July)

Jonathan Chetwynd

• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Tuesday, 18 September)
• Re: UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Friday, 14 September)
• UA/GL duplication of effort? Re: Review of Script Techniques for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (part 2.) (Wednesday, 12 September)

Jonny Axelsson

• Re: Responses to Opera issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 I (Wednesday, 11 July)

Jose Euclides da Silva Junior - DIGR.O

• User agent (Wednesday, 26 September)

Judy Brewer

• Update on W3C/WAI mailing lists (Thursday, 9 August)

Lauren Meek

• User Agent Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 (Monday, 13 August)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• Re: Tentative FTF meeting agenda available (Thursday, 30 August)

Louis Atkinson

• HTTP USER-AGENT header question (Wednesday, 18 July)

oedipus@hicom.net

• Re: [Proposal] Checkpoint 4.5: Clarification that direct access rapid access requirement (Thursday, 30 August)

Philippe Le Hegaret

• Re: DOM 3 Events comments (Friday, 24 August)
• DOM Level 3 Events updated (Thursday, 23 August)

Randy Marsden

• RE: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)

Richard Schwerdtfeger

• Re: Updated FTF meeting (Tuesday, 11 September)
• Re: Raw minutes from 30 August 2001 UAWG teleconf (Agreement to request CR) (Friday, 31 August)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 2 August)
• Action item: Techniques for addressing cross-platform accessibility solutions (Sunday, 15 July)
• Action item: Techniques for addressing cross-platform accessibility solutions (Sunday, 15 July)
• Action Item: URL for Web Access Gateway Presentation (Thursday, 12 July)
• Your response SVG group's response to UA Guide (Thursday, 12 July)

Rob Lanphier

• Re: Responses to RealNetworks issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 19 July)

Steven Pemberton

• Re: Responses to HTML WG issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Thursday, 19 July)

T. V. Raman

• FrontPage --ruining accessibility even when the author has good intent (Tuesday, 4 September)

Tantek Celik

• RE: !important (Sunday, 22 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Thursday, 12 July)
• Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. (Wednesday, 11 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Tuesday, 10 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raisedduring third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)
• Re: Responses to Tantek Çelik issues raised during third last call of UAAG 1.0 (Monday, 9 July)

Tim Lacy

• Flash question (Thursday, 20 September)
• RE: Updated FTF meeting (Thursday, 6 September)

Wendy A Chisholm

• RE: !important (Tuesday, 17 July)
• !important (Monday, 16 July)

Last message date: Wednesday, 26 September 2001 15:45:17 UTC