- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 08:51:51 -0400
- To: w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
At 07:35 AM 2001-07-12 , Tantek Celik wrote: >From: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org> >Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Checkpoint 4.1Configure text size. >Date: Wed, Jul 11, 2001, 10:54 AM > ><snip> > >> I would not object to a clarification that we are not talking >> about text drawing capabilities of the operating environment but font >> size (and family) selection services that are conventional in the >> operating enviornment. >> >> So, tell me if this makes sense: >> >> <NEW4> >> Allow the user to choose from among the full range of font sizes offered >> by the conventional font selection mechanism of the operating environment. >> If the operating environment does not offer such a mechanism, allow >> the user to choose from among the full range enabled by conventional >> text drawing APIs of the operating environment. >> </NEW4> > >This addresses all the concerns I had about Checkpoint 4.1, and encourages >better design that is more consistent with the operating environment. > >So, yes, your proposal makes a whole lot of sense. > Yes, I would rate this change as an improvement. FWIW: Possible wordsmith... <NEW4.end> If the operating environment does not offer such a mechanism, allow the user to choose from among the full range enabled by conventional text drawing APIs of the operating environment. </NEW4.end> <NEW5.end> If the operating environment does not offer such a mechanism, allow the user to choose any size offered by text-drawing services available from the operating environment. </NEW5.end> If you want to stick with 'APIs' rather than 'services' that's fine, too. These APIs are the application developer's interface to utility services; it's just two ways of looking at the same thing. Al >> I like the idea of a cascade, but I am not familiar enough with the >> operating enviornment mechanisms in play here to say whether this >> specific one makes sense. > >It makes _a_lot_ of sense, and this is far simpler than a cascade. > >If the OS has a standard font size UI, developers are encouraged to use it, >or provide at least as much functionality as it. > >If the OS has no font size UI, then developers are encouraged to simply >provide the full range of sizes available at the next lower level - the OS >API. > >Either way, consistency with the operating environment is encouraged, at as >high a level as possible. > >Thanks, > >Tantek >
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2001 08:41:29 UTC