- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:57:01 -0500
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
Responses in JRG: >How many is sufficient? JRG: We don't have a requirement for how many increments now, so that would not change with this proposal. >In this regard, colors are harder than fonts. >I would be more comfortable saying that 10 font sizes are sufficient >than I would saying that 16 colors are sufficient. > >I am uncomfortable drawing an arbitrary distinction here (e.g., >the larger half of available sizes for a particular font family). >However, I think this is worth discussing (but not for very long!). JRG: I am not saying the larger half. All it is saying that the range of fonts must include the largest font available for that family, which is part of the current requirement. The number of increments to the largest font would be the same as the current requirement, basically what the OS environment supports in terms of increments. The only difference from the current proposal is that the UA developer gets to choose the smallest font size they want to support. > > The user agent can satisfy this checkpoint by supporting the full > > range of font sizes supported by the operating system. > >(This sentence is unnecessary at the checkpoint level.) It could be added as a note, if the group felt it was important. Jon Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services MC-574 College of Applied Life Studies University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: (217) 244-5870 Fax: (217) 333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 11:55:42 UTC