- From: Jon Gunderson <jongund@uiuc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2001 13:18:25 -0500
- To: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>
- Cc: Tantek Celik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, w3c-wai-ua@w3.org
>I am uncomfortable with a scenario where the user has available >9, 10, and 80 points only as I think that for many users, 80 points >will not result in a usable environment, and 36 points would be >a much better solution. In fact, 80 points would make browsing >nearly unusable for many people. > >I think more granularity is required, and in the past we have >not been able to establish with certainty any granularity other >than "everything". > JRG: If this is the case then our current wording would allow a conforming user agent to offer just two choices, largest and smallest font size for a particular font family (1 point and 80 point???), since this include the full range of many operating systems. >Is there a way to get > a) Biggest font. > b) A few other big fonts. > >That's why I mentioned in passing: the top half of the size range. > > _ Ian > >-- >Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs >Cell: +1 917 450-8783 Jon Gunderson, Ph.D., ATP Coordinator of Assistive Communication and Information Technology Division of Rehabilitation - Education Services MC-574 College of Applied Life Studies University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign 1207 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820 Voice: (217) 244-5870 Fax: (217) 333-0248 E-mail: jongund@uiuc.edu WWW: http://www.staff.uiuc.edu/~jongund WWW: http://www.w3.org/wai/ua
Received on Wednesday, 11 July 2001 14:17:11 UTC