Abbie Barbir
Anish Karmarkar
- Compromise Proposal [was -- Re: TIBCO objects to last call] (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: TIBCO objects to last call (Saturday, 26 March)
- Re: TIBCO objects to last call (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: Demonstrating the obvious (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: Why is [destination] defined as an IRI? (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: New issue: Notification relationship IRI (Wednesday, 9 March)
- Re: Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting (Monday, 7 March)
- Can ReferenceParameters contain message addressing properties defined in WS-Addresing core (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks (Tuesday, 1 March)
Ashok Malhotra
Christopher B Ferris
Conor P. Cahill
David Hull
- WSRM from a WSA perspective (Wednesday, 30 March)
- Re: Compromise Proposal [was -- Re: TIBCO objects to last call] (Monday, 28 March)
- Re: TIBCO objects to last call (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: TIBCO objects to last call (Friday, 25 March)
- NEW ISSUE: Dependencies with other groups (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: TIBCO objects to last call (resend) (Thursday, 24 March)
- NEW ISSUE: Should MAPs be divorced from the rest of the specification? (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: TIBCO objects to last call (resend) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: TIBCO objects to last call (resend) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: TIBCO objects to last call (resend) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Re: TIBCO objects to last call (resend) (Thursday, 24 March)
- TIBCO objects to last call (Wednesday, 23 March)
- TIBCO objects to last call (resend) (Thursday, 24 March)
- Use of WSA in other specs. (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Demonstrating the obvious (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Questions about the current draft. (Tuesday, 22 March)
- Who depends on us? (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-03-21 (Monday, 21 March)
- Stepping back a bit ... (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Friday, 18 March)
- What does it mean for a MAP to be "mandatory"? (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: A minor question (Thursday, 17 March)
- Which properties are optional depends on the protocol (Thursday, 17 March)
- Reply-to and in-reply-to are orthogonal (Thursday, 17 March)
- Special treatment for well-known endpoints (Thursday, 17 March)
- Sketch for request/reply/alternate (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Handling arbitrary sets of associated endpoints (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: Charter requirements [was: Process requirements for going to Last Call] (Wednesday, 16 March)
- SOAP properties in non request/reply interactions (Tuesday, 15 March)
- MAPs and SOAP (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Handling arbitrary sets of associated endpoints (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Handling arbitrary sets of associated endpoints (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Handling arbitrary sets of associated endpoints (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: What, if anything, comes back on the HTTP reply if fault is non-default? (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Handling arbitrary sets of associated endpoints (Friday, 11 March)
- NEW ISSUE: Handling arbitrary sets of associated endpoints (Thursday, 10 March)
- What, if anything, comes back on the HTTP reply if fault is non-default? (Thursday, 10 March)
- What to do about MAP extensibility, if we need to (Tuesday, 8 March)
- A minor question (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Request/reply/reply (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Issue 50 and points west (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 50 (Misallignment of faut to and reply to ) (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 50 (Misallignment of faut to and reply to ) (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 50 (Misallignment of faut to and reply to ) (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Relationship in in/out/request/reply (Tuesday, 1 March)
David Orchard
Doug Davis
Eran Chinthaka
Francisco Curbera
Glen Daniels
HF/EAB
Hugo Haas
- Re: wsa:Action in responses (Monday, 21 March)
- Re: wsa:Action in responses (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: Charter requirements [was: Process requirements for going to Last Call] (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: wsa:Action in responses (Tuesday, 15 March)
- i050: Characterization of underlying issues and of proposals seen so far (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: Proposing a wsa:Security element (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: Proposing a wsa:Security element (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: Minutes for the 2005-02-27 F2F (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: Minutes for the 2005-02-27 F2F (Wednesday, 9 March)
- Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 50 (Misallignment of faut to and reply to ) (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: i004: Text for reorganization of security sections (Tuesday, 1 March)
- i007: new proposal for discussion (was Re: Issue 7 convo from Melbourne) (Tuesday, 1 March)
Jonathan Marsh
- NEW ISSUE: Editorial: bad WSDL 1.1 namespace URI in Example 2.3 (Saturday, 26 March)
- NEW ISSUE: Editorial: WSDL Binding prefix table (Saturday, 26 March)
- RE: TIBCO objects to last call (Friday, 25 March)
- RE: TIBCO objects to last call (Friday, 25 March)
- WS_Addressing_Scenarios contribution from Microsoft (Monday, 21 March)
- RE: MAPs and SOAP (Monday, 21 March)
- RE: MAPs and SOAP (Saturday, 19 March)
- RE: What does it mean for a MAP to be "mandatory"? (Friday, 18 March)
- RE: wsa:Action in responses (Friday, 18 March)
- RE: MAPs and SOAP (Friday, 18 March)
- RE: A minor question (Friday, 18 March)
- i050: FaultTo fallback to ReplyTo rule (Monday, 14 March)
- RE: What, if anything, comes back on the HTTP reply if fault is non-default? (Friday, 11 March)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Handling arbitrary sets of associated endpoints (Friday, 11 March)
- RE: WSA SOAP Binding minor editorial issues (Thursday, 10 March)
- RE: WSA SOAP Binding minor editorial issues (Thursday, 10 March)
- WSA SOAP Binding minor editorial issues (Wednesday, 9 March)
- RE: Editorial work on issue 53 complete (Wednesday, 9 March)
- WSA Core minor editorial issues (Tuesday, 8 March)
- i050: Misalignment of treatment of reply messages and fault messages (Monday, 7 March)
- RE: Proposed resolution for Issue 50 (Misallignment of faut to and reply to ) (Wednesday, 2 March)
Marc Hadley
- Re: A minor question (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: A minor question (Friday, 18 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Re: Charter requirements [was: Process requirements for going to Last Call] (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: Proposing a wsa:Security element (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: Proposing a wsa:Security element (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: Proposing a wsa:Security element (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: WSA SOAP Binding minor editorial issues (Saturday, 12 March)
- Re: WSA Core minor editorial issues (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: WSA SOAP Binding minor editorial issues (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: WSA SOAP Binding minor editorial issues (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: wsa:Type still around? (Wednesday, 9 March)
- Editorial work on issue 53 complete (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 50 (Misallignment of faut to and reply to ) (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Updated Ed Drafts Available (Wednesday, 2 March)
Mark Baker
Mark Little
Mark Nottingham
- Re: Last Call for Web Services Addressing Core and SOAP Binding (Thursday, 31 March)
- Last Call for Web Services Addressing Core and SOAP Binding (Thursday, 31 March)
- Minutes for the 2005-03-28 teleconference (Thursday, 31 March)
- Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-03-28 [NOTE CHANGED TIMES] (Sunday, 27 March)
- Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-03-28 (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: Compromise Proposal [was -- Re: TIBCO objects to last call] (Sunday, 27 March)
- Re: TIBCO objects to last call (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Dependencies with other groups (Friday, 25 March)
- Re: TIBCO objects to last call (Thursday, 24 March)
- Minutes of the 2005-03-21 telconference (Wednesday, 23 March)
- Re: Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-03-21 (Monday, 21 March)
- Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-03-21 (Sunday, 20 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Handling arbitrary sets of associated endpoints [i054] (Sunday, 20 March)
- Re: MAPs and SOAP (Friday, 18 March)
- Minutes of the 2005-03-14 teleconference (Wednesday, 16 March)
- Charter requirements [was: Process requirements for going to Last Call] (Tuesday, 15 March)
- Re: Help on ws-addressing (Monday, 14 March)
- Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-03-14 (Saturday, 12 March)
- Re: Minutes for the 2005-02-27 F2F (Thursday, 10 March)
- Re: Minutes for the 2005-02-27 F2F (Wednesday, 9 March)
- Re: Editorial work on issue 53 complete (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Minutes of the 2005-03-07 teleconference (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks [i053] (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting (Monday, 7 March)
- Agenda: WS-A telcon 2005-03-07 (Saturday, 5 March)
- Minutes for the 2005-02-27 [resend] (Friday, 4 March)
- Minutes for the 2005-02-27 F2F (Thursday, 3 March)
- Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: i004: Text for reorganization of security sections (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Definition of SOAP 1.2 (and 1.1) modules [i022] (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: i007: new proposal for discussion (was Re: Issue 7 convo from Melbourne) (Tuesday, 1 March)
Mark Peel
Martin Gudgin
Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS)
noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
Paul Cotton
paul.downey@bt.com
Rice, Ed (HP.com)
Rich Salz
- RE: A minor question (Thursday, 17 March)
- Re: Proposing a wsa:Security element (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: Proposing a wsa:Security element (Monday, 14 March)
- RE: trust model and epr security (Sunday, 13 March)
- trust model and epr security (Saturday, 12 March)
- Proposing a wsa:Security element (Saturday, 12 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Handling arbitrary sets of associated endpoints (Friday, 11 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Handling arbitrary sets of associated endpoints (Friday, 11 March)
- RE: RFC 2616 (rfc2616) - Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1Re: Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Re: Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: RFC 2616 (rfc2616) - Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.1Re: Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: Minutes of the Web Services Addressing / TAG joint meeting (Friday, 4 March)
- RE: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: New issue: Notification relationship IRI (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks (Thursday, 3 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks (Tuesday, 1 March)
Rogers, Tony
Sanjiva Weerawarana
Savas Parastatidis
Srinivas, Davanum M
Tim Berners-Lee
Tom Rutt
- Re: Full text for Issue 50 Proposal (Monday, 14 March)
- Full text for Issue 50 Proposal (Monday, 14 March)
- Re: Additional Proposals for Resolving Issue 50 (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Additional Proposals for Resolving Issue 50 (Tuesday, 8 March)
- Minimal Proposed Changes to Resolve Issue 50 (Monday, 7 March)
- Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 50 (Misallignment of faut to and reply to ) (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks (Wednesday, 2 March)
- Re: Proposed resolution for Issue 50 (Misallignment of faut to and reply to ) (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Re: NEW ISSUE: Schema tweaks (Tuesday, 1 March)
- Proposed resolution for Issue 50 (Misallignment of faut to and reply to ) (Tuesday, 1 March)
Vinoski, Stephen
Winkler, Steve
Yalcinalp, Umit
Last message date: Thursday, 31 March 2005 21:59:37 UTC