- From: Mark Nottingham <mark.nottingham@bea.com>
- Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:23:24 -0800
- To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
This is now issue 053; http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/wd-issues/#i053 On Feb 27, 2005, at 6:23 AM, Jonathan Marsh wrote: > > In looking at the schema at > http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2004/ws/addressing/ws-addr.xsd and > see a few improvements that could be made. > > Title: Suggested schema tweaks > > Description: There are several ways to improve the schema, as proposed > below. > > Justification: Improve the schema :-) > > Target: Schema > > Proposal: > > 1) Add attribute wildcards to ReferenceParamatersType and PoliciesType > so there is consistent attribute extensibility throughout. > > 2) The spec says @RelationshipType defaults to > "http://www.w3.org/2005/02/addressing/reply" but this isn't indicated > in > the schema. Although we don't want to require schema validation in > order to construct the property value correctly, is there a reason we > shouldn't describe this defaulting in the schema? > > 3) Add @blockDefault="#all" to xs:schema. > > 4) Add @elementFormDefault="qualified" to xs:schema. > > 5) We seem to mix styles on the names of types. Some end in "Type", > others don't. Suggest adding "Type" AttributedURI, AttributedQName, > FaultCodesOpenEnum, FaultCodes, AttributedNonNegativeInteger. > > > > -- Mark Nottingham Principal Technologist Office of the CTO BEA Systems
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 19:23:32 UTC