- From: Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS) <nilo.mitra@ericsson.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 07:31:24 -0600
- To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Cc: WS-Addressing <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
+1 Nilo > -----Original Message----- > From: Hugo Haas [mailto:hugo@w3.org] > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 2:16 AM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Cc: Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS); WS-Addressing > Subject: Re: wsa:Action in responses > > * Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> [2005-03-18 14:21-0800] > > Are you proposing to remove "(and opaquely)"? > > Does it bring anything to the description of wsa:Action? > > My feeling is that "(and opaquely)" only brings confusion, so > I wouldn't be sad to see it go away if I'm right. > > So, yes, I'd like to propose to get rid of it. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/ >
Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 13:32:01 UTC