- From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 15:32:28 -0500
- To: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
If the SOAP protocol being used supports the SOAP request/reply MEP (which is true somewhat trivially right now), then [source],[reply endpoint], [fault endpoint], [message ID] and [relationship] should all be OPTIONAL. They may make sense in some larger context, but they're not required to make request/reply happen. The SOAP protocol is already providing this. If the SOAP protocol being used does not support the SOAP request/reply MEP, but does support the (as yet hypothetical) SOAP one-way MEP, then at least some of the above will be required to make the MEP work (see previous message on orthogonality, though). I tend to think much of the current debate over [reply endpoint] [fault endpoint], the anonymous EPR and so forth stems from trying to support both of these scenarios simultaneously in the core.
Received on Thursday, 17 March 2005 20:33:04 UTC