RE: A minor question

Great! It's going to be 29 time zones in less than a week by the time I
get home tomorrow

Sounds like I'll have plenty of excuse for just about anything!

;-)

Gudge 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM [mailto:Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: 18 March 2005 13:46
> To: Martin Gudgin
> Cc: Jonathan Marsh; Mark Baker; David Hull; 
> public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> Subject: Re: A minor question
> 
> I'd think you could use that as an excuse for much more serious 
> infractions than mere verbosity ;-).
> 
> On Mar 18, 2005, at 3:48 PM, Martin Gudgin wrote:
> 
> >
> > Can I use jet-lag and crossing 21 time zones as an excuse for 
> > verbosity?
> >
> > Gudge
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Jonathan Marsh
> >> Sent: 18 March 2005 12:44
> >> To: Martin Gudgin; Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM
> >> Cc: Mark Baker; David Hull; public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> >> Subject: RE: A minor question
> >>
> >> Or, more simply and directly:
> >>
> >> /soap:Envelope/soap:Body[count(*)=1]/soap:Fault
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-
> >>> addressing-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Martin Gudgin
> >>> Sent: Friday, March 18, 2005 6:50 AM
> >>> To: Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM
> >>> Cc: Mark Baker; David Hull; public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> >>> Subject: RE: A minor question
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sorry, yes, my XPath was sloppy. It should be
> >>>
> >>> /soap:Envelope/soap:Body/soap:Fault[count(preceding-sibling::* |
> >>> following-sibling::*)=0]
> >>>
> >>> Gudge
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM [mailto:Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM]
> >>>> Sent: 18 March 2005 06:19
> >>>> To: Martin Gudgin
> >>>> Cc: Mark Baker; David Hull; public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> >>>> Subject: Re: A minor question
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mar 17, 2005, at 6:07 PM, Martin Gudgin wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> A fault is any message for which the following XPath expression
> >>>>> evaluates to true;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /soap:Envelope/soap:Body/soap:Fault
> >>>>>
> >>>>> See[1], specifically;
> >>>>>
> >>>>> "To be recognized as carrying SOAP error information, a SOAP
> >>> message
> >>>>> MUST contain a single SOAP Fault element information item
> >>>> as the only
> >>>>> child element information item of the SOAP Body"
> >>>>>
> >>>> Picky, but I don't think the XPath captures "the only child
> >>>> EII of the
> >>>> SOAP Body", e.g. the following satisfies the XPath but not
> >>>> the complete
> >>>> criteria:
> >>>>
> >>>> <soap:Envelope>
> >>>>    <soap:Body>
> >>>>      <foo:bar/>
> >>>>      <soap:Fault>
> >>>>      ...
> >>>>      </soap:Fault>
> >>>>    </soap:Body>
> >>>> </soap:Envelope>
> >>>>
> >>>> Marc.
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/soap12-part1/#soapfault
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>>>> From: Mark Baker [mailto:distobj@acm.org]
> >>>>>> Sent: 17 March 2005 14:56
> >>>>>> To: Martin Gudgin
> >>>>>> Cc: David Hull; public-ws-addressing@w3.org
> >>>>>> Subject: Re: A minor question
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 02:16:11PM -0800, Martin Gudgin wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've not seen an answer to this question, so here goes;
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> A fault is just a reply. So the relationship would be reply.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> +1
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> You can
> >>>>>>> tell it's a fault because SOAP defines a fault message very
> >>>>>>> specifically.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Actually, it doesn't.  But let's not go there. 8-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-dist-
> >>> app/2002Mar/0007.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mark.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> >>>> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> ---
> Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com>
> Web Technologies and Standards, Sun Microsystems.
> 
>

Received on Friday, 18 March 2005 22:57:47 UTC