- From: Rogers, Tony <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>
- Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 08:04:47 +1100
- To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>, "David Hull" <dmh@tibco.com>
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 21:05:21 UTC
My first reaction was "of course they do!". My second reaction was "er, hang on a second...". You have a gift for asking awkward questions :-) Yes, I believe there is a place for SOAP Faults in multi-message MEPs (don't say that with a mouth full of cereal). The Fault is conveying an indication that something did not proceed according to plan. It is often treated differently by intermediaries. Tony -----Original Message----- From: public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org on behalf of Rich Salz Sent: Sat 12-Mar-05 6:27 To: David Hull Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org Subject: Re: NEW ISSUE: Handling arbitrary sets of associated endpoints You edge up to an interesting question: Do SOAP Faults make sense in other than request/response? -- Rich Salz, Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html
Received on Friday, 11 March 2005 21:05:21 UTC