Re: wsa:Action in responses from Hugo Haas on 2005-03-21 (public-ws-addressing@w3.org from March 2005)

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 08:15:30 +0100
To: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Nilo Mitra (TX/EUS)" <nilo.mitra@ericsson.com>, WS-Addressing <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050321071530.GC5132@w3.org>

* Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com> [2005-03-18 14:21-0800]
> Are you proposing to remove "(and opaquely)"?

Does it bring anything to the description of wsa:Action?

My feeling is that "(and opaquely)" only brings confusion, so I
wouldn't be sad to see it go away if I'm right.

So, yes, I'd like to propose to get rid of it.

Cheers,

Hugo

-- 
Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Monday, 21 March 2005 07:15:31 UTC