- From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:27:05 +0100
- To: "Conor P. Cahill" <concahill@aol.com>
- Cc: WS-Addressing <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 13:27:07 UTC
* Conor P. Cahill <concahill@aol.com> [2005-03-11 10:22-0500] > I am not comfortable with the current model for the [action] property on > response messages that requires that the [action] be specfied and the > WSDL binding requires that this be set to the WSDL output binding for > the input request. > > I believe that the [action] element should be associated with the > receiving party and not the sending party. In the case of a response, > the receiving party is the client (who's WSDL is *not* specifed on the > host side). Actually, I see [action] associated with a message, not any particular sending or receiving node: as the spec describes it, it is "an identifier that uniquely (and opaquely) identifies the semantics implied by this message." So I don't see any problem here. Cheers, Hugo -- Hugo Haas - W3C mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 13:27:07 UTC