W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2005

Re: wsa:Action in responses

From: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:27:05 +0100
To: "Conor P. Cahill" <concahill@aol.com>
Cc: WS-Addressing <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20050315132705.GZ20469@w3.org>
* Conor P. Cahill <concahill@aol.com> [2005-03-11 10:22-0500]
>    I am not comfortable with the current model for the [action] property on
>    response messages that requires that the [action] be specfied and the
>    WSDL binding requires that this be set to the WSDL output binding for
>    the input request.
>    I believe that the [action] element should be associated with the
>    receiving party and not the sending party.  In the case of a response,
>    the receiving party is the client (who's WSDL is *not* specifed on the
>    host side).

Actually, I see [action] associated with a message, not any particular
sending or receiving node: as the spec describes it, it is "an
identifier that uniquely (and opaquely) identifies the semantics
implied by this message."

So I don't see any problem here.



Hugo Haas - W3C
mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/

Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2005 13:27:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:28:24 UTC