W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2005

A minor question

From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 13:56:26 -0500
To: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-id: <422DF55A.7000307@tibco.com>

Why do we predefine a "reply" relationship but not a "fault" 
relationship?  The idea would be that a fault would be tagged with 
(fault, requestMID) as opposed to (reply, requestMID).

I had expected to see this as a resolved issue in the issues list, but 
apparently not.  I haven't trawled through the mailing list archives, so 
apologies if it's already been done to death.
Received on Tuesday, 8 March 2005 18:56:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:28:24 UTC