Why is [destination] defined as an IRI?

• From: HF/EAB <andreas.bjarlestam@ericsson.com>
• Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 07:01:06 +0100
• To: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
• Message-ID: <4AFFBE68BCD2C04EB6EEA03FBC9CF4BE1CF99F@esealmw115.eemea.ericsson.se>

Why is the [destination] defined as an IRI while the [source endpoint], [reply endpoint] and [fault endpoint] are defined as endpoint references? Why can they not be treated equally? Is there a fundamental difference?

.Andreas

Received on Thursday, 10 March 2005 06:01:10 UTC