- From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
- Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:17:12 -0800
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- CC: "Rogers, Tony" <Tony.Rogers@ca.com>, Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Any reason not to use xs:duration rather than xs:unsignedInt or some derived type of it? Curious? -Anish -- Rich Salz wrote: > >> You are assuming a unit of measure of milliseconds. If we move to a >> unit of say, microseconds, then an xs:unsignedInt becomes inadequate. >> I'd rather use a 64 bit integer to ensure that we have heaps of headroom. > > > Yes, the spec currently says millisec; if you want to change it, make a > proposal. > > I think millisec/32-bits/seven-weeks-limit makes a better trade-off. I > think it's more important we fit "naturally" into what most CPU's are > using these days, then we give a server the ability to say "come back in > 50 days" > > /r$ >
Received on Tuesday, 1 March 2005 20:29:19 UTC