- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:39:51 -0500
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Thanks Mark. I had attempted to represent your position and apparently came close but didn't quite nail the details. Mark Baker writes: > (quoting the minutes...NRM) > > ] So, I think Mark has fairly clearly stated that > ] he wants the URI >only< at the HTTP level, not > ] duplicated. > Duplication is generally a bad idea IMO, so it > would be nice that any solution avoid it. I remembered your saying that before, and I apparently misquoted it as representing the net of your position. > But my concern is just that the URI needs to make > it to the application protocol envelope, and if > duplication is required for that to happen, then > that's fine by me. Thank you for the clarification. FWIW, that's at least generally my position too. Restating in my words: it's important to make at least a serious effort to properly use an "underlying" protocol such as HTTP. Duplication has serious downsides, but also some advantages, and may be a reasonable compromise in some cases, perhaps this one. -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Friday, 4 March 2005 15:40:28 UTC