W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2005

Re: New issue: Notification relationship IRI

From: Conor P. Cahill <concahill@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 13:30:52 -0500
To: "Rich Salz" <rsalz@datapower.com>
cc: WS-Addressing <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <422757DC.7060200@aol.com>

Rich Salz wrote on 3/3/2005, 11:20 AM:

 > > The proposed IRI would be:
 > >
 > >     http://www.w3.org/@@@@/@@@/addressing/notification
 > So this could be considered like the HTTP "100 continue", in a way.
 > Or a non-normative response?
 > Or those little "in progress" meters.

Those work.. We wouls also use it for after-response messages (e.g., a
request is made for some data, the response is sent.  Later the
entity that processed the request needs to send a notification
that is related to its previous response (perhaps invalidating
the former response).

Received on Thursday, 3 March 2005 18:32:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 19:28:24 UTC