public-tracking@w3.org from July 2013 by date

Wednesday, 31 July 2013

• Re: Resignation from the Tracking Protection Working Group Rigo Wenning
• Re: CDDs position Matthias Schunter (Intel)
• Re: Resignation from the Tracking Protection Working Group Justin Brookman
• Re: Resignation from the Tracking Protection Working Group Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: More blocking tools than DNT Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: Marking the last call deadline John Simpson
• Marking the last call deadline Lee Tien

Tuesday, 30 July 2013

• CDDs position Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Resignation from the Tracking Protection Working Group Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Resignation from the Tracking Protection Working Group John Simpson
• Resignation from the Tracking Protection Working Group Jonathan Mayer
• RE: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
• next TPWG call: 4 September, usual time Thomas Roessler
• RE: More blocking tools than DNT Mike O'Neill
• Re: More blocking tools than DNT Walter van Holst

Monday, 29 July 2013

• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Chris Mejia
• Re: Scheduling for next call Chris Mejia
• More blocking tools than DNT Rigo Wenning
• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Mike O'Neill
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rigo Wenning
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Walter van Holst
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses SULLIVAN, BRYAN L
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Aleecia M. McDonald

Sunday, 28 July 2013

• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Mike O'Neill
• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Shane Wiley
• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Mike O'Neill
• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Mike O'Neill
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Alan Chapell
• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Shane Wiley
• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Shane Wiley
• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Mike O'Neill
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rigo Wenning
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Mike O'Neill
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rigo Wenning
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Aleecia M. McDonald

Saturday, 27 July 2013

• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Peter Cranstone
• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Shane Wiley
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Chris Mejia
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Chris Mejia
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rigo Wenning
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Peter Cranstone
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Chris Mejia
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Chris Mejia
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Peter Cranstone
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Chris Mejia
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Peter Cranstone
• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Mike O'Neill

Friday, 26 July 2013

• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Chris Mejia
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Chris Mejia
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Chris Mejia
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Peter Cranstone
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Chris Mejia
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Chris Mejia
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Aleecia M. McDonald

Thursday, 25 July 2013

• Re: issue-25: amendment period on audience measurement Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: Issue-205 for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Peter Cranstone
• Re: Issue-205 for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Alan Chapell
• Re: New editors draft? Nicholas Doty
• issue-25: amendment period on audience measurement Thomas Roessler
• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rob van Eijk
• Re: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rigo Wenning
• Re: Scheduling for next call Thomas Roessler
• Re: Scheduling for next call Aleecia M. McDonald
• RE: ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Shane Wiley
• Re: New editors draft? John Simpson

Wednesday, 24 July 2013

• Re: New editors draft? Heather West
• Re: Scheduling for next call Rigo Wenning
• ISSUE-151 Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rigo Wenning
• RE: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Shane Wiley
• New editors draft? John Simpson
• Re: Scheduling for next call Jack Hobaugh
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rigo Wenning
• Re: minutes (was Re: Path forward...) Rigo Wenning
• Re: Scheduling for next call John Simpson
• Re: minutes (was Re: Path forward...) John Simpson
• Scheduling for next call Thomas Roessler
• minutes (was Re: Path forward...) Nicholas Doty
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• RE: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Shane Wiley
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Rigo Wenning
• Re: Issue 25 Audience Measurement Research Notes and follow up from our call yesterday Ronan Heffernan
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Aleecia M. McDonald
• Fwd: Issue 25 Audience Measurement Research Notes and follow up from our call yesterday Thomas Roessler
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Walter van Holst
• Re: ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research : answers to questions Jonathan Mayer

Tuesday, 23 July 2013

• Re: ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research : answers to questions John Simpson
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Dan Auerbach
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Rigo Wenning
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Peter Cranstone
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Alan Chapell
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Rigo Wenning
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Rigo Wenning
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Joseph Lorenzo Hall
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Chris Mejia
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rigo Wenning
• Re: Path forward... Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses John Simpson
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Aleecia M. McDonald
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Vinay Goel
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rigo Wenning
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Rigo Wenning
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Vinay Goel
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses John Simpson
• Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED) Chris Mejia
• Re: Path forward... Alan Chapell
• Agenda for Wed July 24 Matthias Schunter (Intel)
• Path forward... Matthias Schunter (Intel)
• ISSUE-25: Audience measurement research : answers to questions Kathy Joe
• RE: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Mike O'Neill
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rigo Wenning
• request measurement uses Jeffrey Chester
• Re: extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments Rob van Eijk
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rob van Eijk
• RE: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Mike O'Neill
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Jeffrey Chester

Monday, 22 July 2013

• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Ronan Heffernan
• Re: audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments Rigo Wenning
• Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rigo Wenning
• Re: extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments Rigo Wenning
• Re: extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments Jonathan Mayer
• Re: WED agenda achapell
• Re: Explanatory Memorandum Thomas Roessler
• Re: WED agenda Thomas Roessler
• Re: Explanatory Memorandum Lauren Gelman
• WED agenda achapell
• RE: issue-25 Mike O'Neill
• Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses Rob van Eijk
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• RE: issue-25 Mike O'Neill
• Re: issue-25 Jeffrey Chester
• Re: issue-25 Rob van Eijk
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• Re: issue-25 Rob van Eijk
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• Re: issue-25 Rob van Eijk
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• RE: issue-25 Mike O'Neill

Saturday, 20 July 2013

• Re: extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments Rob van Eijk
• Re: Explanatory Memorandum Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 19 July 2013

• Re: extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments Rob van Eijk
• Re: audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments Jonathan Mayer
• Re: audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments Rob van Eijk
• Re: audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments John Simpson
• Re: audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments Nicholas Doty
• Re: audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments Jonathan Mayer
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• RE: issue-25 Rob van Eijk
• RE: issue-25 Mike O'Neill
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• RE: Explanatory Memorandum Mike Zaneis
• Re: Explanatory Memorandum Alan Chapell
• Re: Explanatory Memorandum Thomas Roessler
• Re: Issue-205 for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Alan Chapell
• Re: extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments Alan Chapell
• RE: Explanatory Memorandum Shane Wiley
• extension of time on audience measurement suggested amendments Peter Swire
• Re: Explanatory Memorandum Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Explanatory Memorandum Mike Zaneis

Thursday, 18 July 2013

• RE: issue-25 Mike O'Neill
• Re: Explanatory Memorandum Thomas Roessler
• RE: Explanatory Memorandum Shane Wiley
• Re: Explanatory Memorandum Thomas Roessler
• RE: Explanatory Memorandum Shane Wiley
• RE: issue-25 Mike O'Neill
• Re: Explanatory Memorandum Thomas Roessler
• Re: Explanatory Memorandum Alan Chapell
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• RE: issue-25 Mike O'Neill
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• RE: issue-25 Mike O'Neill
• Re: issue-25 Ronan Heffernan
• issue-25 Mike O'Neill
• Re: "What Base Text to Use for the Do Not Track Compliance Specification" David Singer

Wednesday, 17 July 2013

• Perfecting Amendments Jonathan Mayer
• Re: "What Base Text to Use for the Do Not Track Compliance Specification" Roy T. Fielding
• audience measurement perfecting/polishing/friendly amendments Peter Swire
• Re: Issue-205 for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Rigo Wenning
• Re: ISSUE-25: text to be discussed in today's call Dan Auerbach
• Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) Roy T. Fielding
• Fwd: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Nicholas Doty
• Re: ISSUE-25: text to be discussed in today's call Rob van Eijk
• Re: ISSUE-25: text to be discussed in today's call Edward W. Felten
• ISSUE-25: text to be discussed in today's call Peter Swire
• ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Kathy Joe
• FW: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) Peter Swire
• Re: Issue-205 for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Alan Chapell
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Alan Chapell
• ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Kathy Joe
• Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) John Simpson
• Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) Roy T. Fielding
• RE: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) Craig Spiezle
• Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) Roy T. Fielding
• Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) John Simpson

Tuesday, 16 July 2013

• Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) Lee Tien
• Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) John Simpson
• Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) Nicholas Doty
• Re: clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) Nicholas Doty
• clarifying distinctions on ISSUE-24 (security/fraud) Nicholas Doty
• Re: Issue-205 for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Rigo Wenning
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Nicholas Doty
• Re: Agenda for DNT Call July 17 -- amendment Peter Swire
• Re: Agenda for DNT Call July 17 Vinay Goel
• Agenda for DNT Call July 17 Peter Swire
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Peter Cranstone
• Explanatory Memorandum Peter Swire
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Rigo Wenning
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance David Singer
• Re: "What Base Text to Use for the Do Not Track Compliance Specification" Alan Chapell
• Re: procedure for posting comments today John M. Simpson
• "What Base Text to Use for the Do Not Track Compliance Specification" Peter Swire
• Fwd: procedure for posting comments today Lauren Gelman

Monday, 15 July 2013

• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Rigo Wenning
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Alan Chapell
• Re: Claims of DNT proliferation - Evidence? Peter Cranstone
• Re: Claims of DNT proliferation - Evidence? Alan Chapell

Saturday, 13 July 2013

• Re: Industry Amendment Clarifications as Promised on July 10 W3C WG Weekly Call Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Industry Amendment Clarifications as Promised on July 10 W3C WG Weekly Call Justin Brookman
• two procedural issues that came up late on Friday Peter Swire
• Re: what base text to use (was re: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data) [for auerbach] Nicholas Doty
• Re: Industry Amendment Clarifications as Promised on July 10 W3C WG Weekly Call Lauren Gelman

Friday, 12 July 2013

• Re: Industry Amendment Clarifications as Promised on July 10 W3C WG Weekly Call Justin Brookman
• Re: Industry Amendment Clarifications as Promised on July 10 W3C WG Weekly Call John Simpson
• Re: Industry Amendment Clarifications as Promised on July 10 W3C WG Weekly Call Jack Hobaugh
• Re: Industry Amendment Clarifications as Promised on July 10 W3C WG Weekly Call John Simpson
• Re: Industry Amendment Clarifications as Promised on July 10 W3C WG Weekly Call Jack Hobaugh
• Re: Industry Amendment Clarifications as Promised on July 10 W3C WG Weekly Call John Simpson
• Re: procedure for posting comments today / reload results page if you don't see your comments Wendy Seltzer
• Industry Amendment Clarifications as Promised on July 10 W3C WG Weekly Call Jack Hobaugh
• DMA Objection to Editors' Draft Rachel Thomas
• Re: procedure for posting comments today Lou Mastria
• Re: procedure for posting comments today Peter Swire
• Couldn't get this submitted on Site...sending via email Lou Mastria
• RE: procedure for posting comments today Lou Mastria
• Re: what base text to use (was re: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data) [for jmayer] Nicholas Doty
• Claims of DNT proliferation - Evidence? Alex Fowler
• Re: procedure for posting comments today Lauren Gelman
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Roy T. Fielding
• Re: procedure for posting comments today Peter Swire
• Re: procedure for posting comments today Alan Chapell
• procedure for posting comments today Peter Swire
• Chapell - Objection to Editor's draft Alan Chapell
• Re: Browser finger printing? John Simpson
• RE: Browser finger printing? Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley

Thursday, 11 July 2013

• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: URLS/scoring Justin Brookman
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Mike O'Neill
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: URLS/scoring Justin Brookman
• Re: URLS/scoring Edward W. Felten
• Re: URLS/scoring Justin Brookman
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Mike O'Neill
• RE: helpful email exchanges Mike Zaneis
• RE: helpful email exchanges Shane Wiley
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Jeffrey Chester
• Re: helpful email exchanges Jeffrey Chester
• Re: URLS/scoring Edward W. Felten
• RE: Initial Work Plan on Change Proposals, including for next Wednesday Rob van Eijk
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: URLS/scoring Jules Polonetsky
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Justin Brookman
• helpful email exchanges Peter Swire
• RE: Initial Work Plan on Change Proposals, including for next Wednesday Shane Wiley
• RE: Initial Work Plan on Change Proposals, including for next Wednesday Rob van Eijk
• Re: URLS/scoring Paul Ohm
• RE: Initial Work Plan on Change Proposals, including for next Wednesday Shane Wiley
• RE: Initial Work Plan on Change Proposals, including for next Wednesday Rob van Eijk
• RE: Initial Work Plan on Change Proposals, including for next Wednesday Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: URLS/scoring Jonathan Mayer
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: URLS/scoring Edward W. Felten

Wednesday, 10 July 2013

• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: URLS/scoring Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Browser finger printing? John Simpson
• Re: URLS/scoring Jonathan Mayer
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: Browser finger printing? John Simpson
• RE: Browser finger printing? Shane Wiley
• Browser finger printing? John Simpson
• Re: text for Request for Comments/Call for Objections, with deadline this Friday Nicholas Doty
• Re: URLS/scoring Jonathan Mayer
• Re: URLS/scoring Lauren Gelman
• Re: URLS/scoring Jeffrey Chester
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Justin Brookman
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Rob van Eijk
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Rigo Wenning
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: URLS/scoring Peter Swire
• Re: URLS/scoring Jeffrey Chester
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Rigo Wenning
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Peter Cranstone
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Rigo Wenning
• Re: URLS/scoring Justin Brookman
• Re: URLS/scoring Jonathan Mayer
• Re: issue-199 Rigo Wenning
• Re: URLS/scoring Justin Brookman
• Re: URLS/scoring Jonathan Mayer
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: URLS/scoring Justin Brookman
• Re: URLS/scoring Jonathan Mayer
• Re: URLS/scoring Justin Brookman
• Re: URLS/scoring Jonathan Mayer
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Shane Wiley
• RE: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Shane Wiley
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Peter Cranstone
• RE: URLS/scoring Shane Wiley
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Peter Cranstone
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Rigo Wenning
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• RE: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Shane Wiley
• Re: URLS/scoring Justin Brookman
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance David Singer
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• RE: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Shane Wiley
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance David Singer
• Re: URLS/scoring Rob van Eijk
• text for Request for Comments/Call for Objections, with deadline this Friday Peter Swire
• URLS/scoring Justin Brookman
• A list of URLs relevant to today's call Peter Swire
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Alan Chapell
• RE: issue-199 Mike O'Neill
• RE: issue-199 Rob van Eijk
• Re: issue-199 Edward W. Felten
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Sid Stamm
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Justin Brookman
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Peter Cranstone
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Peter Cranstone
• RE: issue-199 Amy Colando (LCA)
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Lee Tien
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Alan Chapell
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Peter Cranstone
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• RE: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Shane Wiley
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Vinay Goel
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Alan Chapell
• Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Rob van Eijk
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Peter Cranstone
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Sid Stamm
• Re: issue-199 Rigo Wenning
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Justin Brookman
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Walter van Holst
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed - User Agent Compliance Alan Chapell
• RE: issue-199 Mike O'Neill
• RE: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Shane Wiley
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• Re: issue-199 Rigo Wenning
• RE: issue-199 Mike O'Neill
• RE: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Shane Wiley
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Edward W. Felten
• RE: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Shane Wiley
• Fwd: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Edward W. Felten
• DAA: please provide real examples on data change practices Jeffrey Chester
• RE: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Shane Wiley
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Edward W. Felten
• RE: issue-199 Rob van Eijk
• Re: issue-199 David Singer
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• RE: issue-199 Mike O'Neill
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• Re: issue-199 David Singer
• Re: issue-199 Rigo Wenning
• Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Kathy Joe
• ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Kathy Joe
• Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Dan Auerbach
• RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Shane Wiley
• RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Shane Wiley
• RE: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Shane Wiley
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• RE: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Shane Wiley
• RE: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Shane Wiley
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• RE: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Shane Wiley
• Re: tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Rob van Eijk
• tracking-ISSUE-215: data hygiene approach / tracking of URL data and browsing activity [Compliance June] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker

Tuesday, 9 July 2013

• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Thomas Roessler
• Re: we need industry responses to questions raised on proposal Peter Swire
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) John Simpson
• we need industry responses to questions raised on proposal Jeffrey Chester
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) achapell
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Edward W. Felten
• Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: John Simpson
• Re: issue-199 Edward W. Felten
• RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: JC Cannon
• Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: John Simpson
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Thomas Roessler
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Edward W. Felten
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Rigo Wenning
• RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: JC Cannon
• Re: issue-199 Rigo Wenning
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain David Singer
• Re: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Edward O'Connor
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Rigo Wenning
• Questions about DAA proposal John Simpson
• RE: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Rob van Eijk
• Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: John Simpson
• RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Israel, Susan
• RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Shane Wiley
• Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: John Simpson
• Re: issue-199 John Simpson
• Re: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft David Singer
• Re: June Tracking Compliance and Scope Draft Change Submission John Simpson
• RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Shane Wiley
• RE: issue-199 Shane Wiley
• RE: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Shane Wiley
• Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: John Simpson
• Re: Change Proposal - First party compliance (Issue - 170) - additional text Alan Chapell
• Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Justin Brookman
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed Alan Chapell
• RE: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Shane Wiley
• RE: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Shane Wiley
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed Edward O'Connor
• Re: Consensus Industry Amendments to the DAA proposal Edward W. Felten
• Re: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft David Singer
• Re: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Edward W. Felten
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed Alan Chapell
• RE: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Shane Wiley
• Re: Consensus Industry Amendments to the DAA proposal John Simpson
• Re: Change Proposal - First party compliance (Issue - 170) - additional text John Simpson
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed John Simpson
• Re: ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: John Simpson
• RE: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Shane Wiley
• Re: DNT Agenda for Wednesday, July 10 Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Rob van Eijk
• DNT Agenda for Wednesday, July 10 Peter Swire
• Re: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft David Singer
• RE: Issue for discussion on Wed Shane Wiley
• Re: Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Rob van Eijk
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Peter Cranstone
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed Alan Chapell
• Re: Consensus Industry Amendments to the DAA proposal Thomas Roessler
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed Alan Chapell
• Consensus Industry Amendments to the DAA proposal Jack Hobaugh
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed Walter van Holst
• Proposed friendly amendments to industry draft Israel, Susan
• Re: Change Proposal - First party compliance (Issue - 170) - additional text Alan Chapell
• Re: June Tracking Compliance and Scope Draft Change Submission Rob Sherman
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed David Singer
• Submitters of the Industry Consensus Proposal (a.k.a. the DAA Proposal) Mike Zaneis
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed Alan Chapell
• Proposed Amendments to the DAA Proposal Vinay Goel
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed Walter van Holst
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed Alan Chapell
• Re: Analysis and opinion on the DAA draft ('Tuesday homework') Justin Brookman
• Re: Issue for discussion on Wed Justin Brookman
• Issue for discussion on Wed Alan Chapell
• ISSUE-25 re 5.2 Audience measurement: ACTION 415 June change proposal: Kathy Joe
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Justin Brookman
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain David Singer
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Rob van Eijk
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Peter Cranstone
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Alan Chapell
• Re: Analysis and opinion on the DAA draft ('Tuesday homework') Peter Swire
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) David Singer
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Rob van Eijk
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) David Singer
• Analysis and opinion on the DAA draft ('Tuesday homework') David Singer
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain David Singer
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Rob van Eijk
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain David Singer
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain David Singer
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Peter Cranstone
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Roy T. Fielding

Monday, 8 July 2013

• Re: June change proposal: permitted uses Nicholas Doty
• Re: June change proposal: permitted uses Nicholas Doty
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) David Singer
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Peter Cranstone
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain John Simpson
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain David Singer
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) David Singer
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) David Singer
• Re: Our work this week Jonathan Mayer
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Peter Cranstone
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain David Singer
• Re: June change proposal: permitted uses Dan Auerbach
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Peter Cranstone
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Definition of user agent? Edward O'Connor
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain David Singer
• Re: Use of 1st Party Data in a 3rd Party Context Walter van Holst
• Re: Use of 1st Party Data in a 3rd Party Context Alan Chapell
• Our work this week Peter Swire
• RE: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Mike O'Neill
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Peter Cranstone
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Roy T. Fielding

Sunday, 7 July 2013

• Re: June Change Proposal: Partial Compliance Peter Cranstone
• Re: June Change Proposal: Partial Compliance Jonathan Mayer
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) Jonathan Mayer
• RE: Definition of user agent? Peter Cranstone
• RE: Definition of user agent? Amy Colando (LCA)
• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain David Singer

Saturday, 6 July 2013

• Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain Roy T. Fielding

Friday, 5 July 2013

• Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain John Simpson

Thursday, 4 July 2013

• Re: De-identifed data John Simpson
• Tracking definition John Simpson
• RE: De-identifed data JC Cannon
• Tracking definition John Simpson
• De-identifed data John Simpson
• Definition of user agent? John Simpson
• Re: Chairs' communication on next steps in the Working Group Jonathan Mayer
• Chairs' communication on next steps in the Working Group Peter Swire
• Re: User agent vs. computer? David Singer

Wednesday, 3 July 2013

• User agent vs. computer? John Simpson
• Re: Change proposal: De-identification (including unlinkability) David Singer
• Re: 'Scope' change proposal David Singer
• RE: Initial Work Plan on Change Proposals, including for next Wednesday Mike O'Neill
• Re: 'Scope' change proposal Dobbs, Brooks
• Other text and DAA proposal? John Simpson
• Supporters of DAA John Simpson
• Re: Question about DAA proposal? Thomas Roessler
• Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research Rigo Wenning
• Re: Initial Work Plan on Change Proposals, including for next Wednesday Jeffrey Chester
• Re: Initial Work Plan on Change Proposals, including for next Wednesday Rob van Eijk
• Re: Initial Work Plan on Change Proposals, including for next Wednesday Rob van Eijk
• Re: 'Scope' change proposal David Singer
• RE: 'not tracking', amendment to the change proposal Mike O'Neill
• Question about DAA proposal? John Simpson
• Re: Work Plan for July Ninja Marnau
• Re: Use of 1st Party Data in a 3rd Party Context Ninja Marnau
• Re: issue-199 Rigo Wenning
• Re: issue-205 Rigo Wenning
• Re: 'not tracking', amendment to the change proposal David Singer
• Re: DNT Agenda for Wednesday, July 3 Thomas Roessler
• Re: DNT Agenda for Wednesday, July 3 Peter Swire
• Re: DNT Agenda for Wednesday, July 3 Thomas Roessler
• RE: Use of 1st Party Data in a 3rd Party Context achapell@CHAPELLASSOCIATES.COM
• Use of 1st Party Data in a 3rd Party Context Yianni Lagos
• Re: 'Scope' change proposal Dobbs, Brooks
• Change proposal: Proposal for a 2-state approach Rob van Eijk
• Change proposal: Counterproposal for a 3-state approach (R-Y-G) Rob van Eijk
• Change proposal: De-identification (including unlinkability) Rob van Eijk
• Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research Justin Brookman
• Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research Peter Swire
• Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research Rob van Eijk
• RE: 'not tracking', amendment to the change proposal Mike O'Neill
• Re: two general change proposals, problems Rob van Eijk
• Re: two general change proposals, problems John Simpson
• two general change proposals, problems David Singer
• DNT:0 change proposal David Singer
• 'existing controls' change proposal David Singer
• 'Scope' change proposal David Singer
• Unknowing collection David Singer
• 'not tracking', amendment to the change proposal David Singer

Tuesday, 2 July 2013

• De-identification change proposal, comments David Singer
• RE: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research Mike O'Neill
• Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research John Simpson
• Re: Work Plan for July Peter Swire
• Re: Work Plan for July Jonathan Mayer
• Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research John Simpson
• Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research Jeffrey Chester
• Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads David Singer
• Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research Rigo Wenning
• Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads David Wainberg
• DNT Agenda for Wednesday, July 3 Peter Swire
• Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research Kathy Joe
• Re: ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research Jeffrey Chester
• Work Plan for July Peter Swire
• ISSUE 25: ACTION 415: Audience measurement research Kathy Joe
• COPPA signalling Mike O'Neill

Monday, 1 July 2013

• Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads David Singer
• Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads David Wainberg
• Re: June Draft - Proposal for User Agent Compliance David Wainberg
• Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads David Singer
• Re: June Change Proposal, tracking David Singer
• Re: June Draft - Change Proposal to definition of "Party" Nicholas Doty
• Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads Jeffrey Chester
• Re: June Change Proposal, raw data, contextual ads David Singer
• Re: June Change Proposal: Partial Compliance Roy T. Fielding
• Re: June Change Proposal: Partial Compliance Roy T. Fielding
• Re: issue-205 Roy T. Fielding
• Re: June Change Proposal: Definition of Tracking (ISSUE-5) David Singer
• Re: June Tracking Compliance and Scope Draft Change Submission Thomas Roessler
• Re: issue-199 Thomas Roessler
• Re: Change proposal: last public working draft Nicholas Doty
• tracking-ISSUE-214: Adding to last public working draft [Compliance June] Tracking Protection Working Group Issue Tracker
• Re: Letter from Dr. Dix (German data protection authority) Ninja Marnau
• Re: June Change Proposal, tracking Roy T. Fielding

Last message date: Wednesday, 31 July 2013 09:25:34 UTC