- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 20:24:40 +0200
- To: Vinay Goel <vigoel@adobe.com>
- Cc: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>, Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, "rob@blaeu.com" <rob@blaeu.com>
Vinay, it is unhelpful to mix the "who set the preference and we fear 50% DNT- users" into each and every discussion we are having. I understand, you're mainly saying: the audience measurement people don't use DNT as their opt-out because there would be too much opt out? So you want that lower opt-out rate too. Apart from that, I think that John has a valid question and that in the process we have to address that question. --Rigo On Tuesday 23 July 2013 10:57:08 Vinay Goel wrote: > While I can't speak for the audience measurement industry, I think > they've made it clear a few times already why they can't honor DNT:1 > as its opt out. Specifically, the audience measurement industry (nor > any industry, for that matter), cannot rely on the validity of who > set DNT:1 and whether the user is truly wishing to opt out from > audience measurement after understanding the value exchange it > provides.
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 18:25:14 UTC