Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED)

On 23/07/2013 23:12, Dan Auerbach wrote:
> My understanding, based on a very clear message from the WG chairs, is
> similar to that of Alan, Aleecia and Jonathan: we need a specific and
> affirmative decision from the group in order to go forward. While I
> understand that a lot of work has been done by the group, I am less
> optimistic about whether that work represented substantive gap-closing
> on critical issues like unique identifiers, de-identification, and data
> retention limits.

This pretty much sums up how I feel about today's call. There are
significant questions on process while the progress on substance has not
been close to what I was hoping for when I joined this group in October
last year.

Regards,

 Walter

Received on Wednesday, 24 July 2013 07:22:37 UTC