Alan, Sounds like we're on the same page. The group needs to make a *specific* decision on a path forwards. Otherwise, we have a deadline in place. Best, Jonathan On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Alan Chapell wrote: > Thanks Rigo. I agree that we may find another option (e.g., Joe's > suggestion of continuing with the technical spec). However, I strongly > support Aleecia's suggestion that the working group making a specific > decision. I'm glad that you seem to agree with that approach. (Please > correct me if I'm wrong as I'm not trying to place words in your mouth). > > Alan > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/23/13 4:07 PM, "Rigo Wenning" <rigo@w3.org (mailto:rigo@w3.org)> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 23 July 2013 11:53:28 Aleecia M. McDonald wrote: > > > I think our options under W3C process are the following: > > > > > > Thanks for the clarity Aleecia... We may discover one more option on our > > way though I don't know yet what that could be.. > > > > --Rigo
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 20:32:09 UTC