- From: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 16:16:58 -0400
- To: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>, <public-tracking@w3.org>
- CC: "Aleecia M. McDonald" <aleecia@aleecia.com>
Thanks Rigo. I agree that we may find another option (e.g., Joe's suggestion of continuing with the technical spec). However, I strongly support Aleecia's suggestion that the working group making a specific decision. I'm glad that you seem to agree with that approach. (Please correct me if I'm wrong as I'm not trying to place words in your mouth). Alan On 7/23/13 4:07 PM, "Rigo Wenning" <rigo@w3.org> wrote: >On Tuesday 23 July 2013 11:53:28 Aleecia M. McDonald wrote: >> I think our options under W3C process are the following: > >Thanks for the clarity Aleecia... We may discover one more option on our >way though I don't know yet what that could be.. > > --Rigo > >
Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 20:17:35 UTC