Re: New editors draft?

John - both Justin and Peter are out, so we should let them chime in too,
but Peter explained the thinking of chairs, editors, and W3C folks here:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-tracking/2013Jun/0145.html

The goal was a streamlined draft to move forward from, given the messy
state of the previous draft. Justin and I agreed, as editors, that was a
promising approach.


On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:56 PM, John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>wrote:

> Hi Heather and Justin,
>
> I wonder if you could please tell the WG what prompted you to decide to
> accept the "June Draft" aka the "Swire/W3C staff draft" as the Editors'
> Working draft.
>
> Any explanation of your reasoning would be most helpful.
>
> Best regards,
>
> John M. Simpson




-- 
Heather West | Google Policy | heatherwest@google.com | 202-643-6381