- From: Rigo Wenning <rigo@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 01:07:38 +0200
- To: public-tracking@w3.org, rob@blaeu.com
- Cc: peter@peterswire.net
Rob, On Saturday 20 July 2013 20:07:30 Rob van Eijk wrote: > Could you please confirm whether we will have a NoGo discussion? the W3C Process does not work like this. Fortunately, because IMHO we would have ended long ago on a Go/NoGo question. The chairs have issued their opinion on what will be the basis for further issue clearing. And their answer was clear. This does not remove the W3C Process nor does it mean that one Draft or the other has received consensus. We had many attempts by the chairs and by several people to take the fast track by finding a lump sum deal. Unfortunately, this hasn't worked out. You note that audience measurement is off the table. This is great! I think we have some issues left. The most juicy one being de- identification that some consider very de-identified and others consider far too identified. You have the merit to have started this inspiring red/yellow/green discussion (or should we name it foo/bar/blob?) IMHO we have to carve out the details now. One by one. And the Group has done great work towards this goal. We just have to stick to our guns. --Rigo
Received on Monday, 22 July 2013 23:08:08 UTC