Re: Path forward... (RESPONSE REQUESTED)

On Tuesday 23 July 2013 11:53:28 Aleecia M. McDonald wrote:
> I think our options under W3C process are the following:

Thanks for the clarity Aleecia... We may discover one more option on our 
way though I don't know yet what that could be..

 --Rigo

Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 20:07:42 UTC