Shouldn't you be cooking barbecue? :-) ________________________________ From: John Simpson<mailto:john@consumerwatchdog.org> Sent: ý7/ý4/ý2013 3:24 PM To: Jack Hobaugh<mailto:jack@networkadvertising.org>; Marc Groman<mailto:mgroman@networkadvertising.org>; Mike Zaneis<mailto:mike@iab.net>; Shane Wiley<mailto:wileys@yahoo-inc.com> Cc: public-tracking@w3.org List<mailto:public-tracking@w3.org> Subject: De-identifed data Colleagues, I am trying to understand the implications of you proposed definition of de-identified data. Could you please: 1. Explain how you definition differs from the June draft and the significance of the differences. In other words in what ways would a data set considered as de-identified by your definition not count as de-identified by the definition in the June draft. 2. Provide several in non-normative language some specific uses cases of what techniques would count as de-identified data under your definition and what would not? Regards, John
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 22:34:51 UTC