- From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 15:28:50 -0700
- To: Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: Marc Groman <mgroman@networkadvertising.org>, Jack Hobaugh <jack@networkadvertising.org>, Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net>, "public-tracking@w3.org List" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Apologies, Shane. I managed to miss that -- or forget it -- in all the traffic today. On Jul 10, 2013, at 3:21 PM, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com> wrote: > John, > > As already discussed on the email list, browser fingerprinting is another form of a unique ID so all text related to unique IDs is equally applicable to this form of identification. > > - Shane > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Simpson [mailto:john@consumerwatchdog.org] > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 11:17 PM > To: Shane Wiley; Marc Groman; Jack Hobaugh; Mike Zaneis > Cc: public-tracking@w3.org List > Subject: Browser finger printing? > > Colleagues, > > Does the DAA proposed text prohibit "browser fingerprinting" if DNT:1 is sent. If so, can you please point me to the relevant portion of text? > > Thank you. > > John >
Received on Wednesday, 10 July 2013 22:29:18 UTC