Re: Confused by DAA's messages. Please explain

On Jul 6, 2013, at 10:20 , Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:

> I can't speak to the DAA proposal (having not even read it yet while on vacation), but I can say that I will continue disregarding semantically invalid HTTP signals no matter what anyone else's opinion might be. 

syntactically invalid I understand.  

what do you mean by 'semantically invalid'?  contradictory?  or you believe I don't mean what I am saying?  or something else?

David Singer
Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.

Received on Sunday, 7 July 2013 03:30:18 UTC