- From: Mike O'Neill <michael.oneill@baycloud.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 08:13:07 +0100
- To: "'David Singer'" <singer@apple.com>, <public-tracking@w3.org>
David, I agree, and "tracking data" is more technology neutral than my text on fingerprinting and identifier duration. We should still explicitly rule out fingerprinting and encourage short duration identifiers for permitted uses in some explanatory non-normative text. Mike -----Original Message----- From: David Singer [mailto:singer@apple.com] Sent: 03 July 2013 01:08 To: public-tracking@w3.org List Subject: 'not tracking', amendment to the change proposal http://www.w3.org/wiki/Privacy/TPWG/Change_Proposal_No_Tracking problem: Though I doubt many sites will want to or be able to claim this state, I don't see a problem in defining it (it is at worst harmless), but I don't think the definition works. proposal: A party may claim that it is not tracking, if it does not retain tracking data after the network transaction is complete. Retaining tracking data includes: 1) Retention by the server of data that falls into the definition of tracking data. 2) Causing the user-agent to retain data, such as cookies, that contains or can be linked to tracking data. Note that tracking data applies to data after a transaction is complete; the site may use in-transaction data for the purposes of satisfying the transaction. David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Wednesday, 3 July 2013 07:13:39 UTC