- From: David Singer <singer@apple.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:10:13 +0100
- To: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org List" <public-tracking@w3.org>
On Jul 8, 2013, at 2:36 , "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: > On Jul 6, 2013, at 5:29 PM, David Singer wrote: >> On Jul 6, 2013, at 10:20 , Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: >> >>> I can't speak to the DAA proposal (having not even read it yet while on vacation), but I can say that I will continue disregarding semantically invalid HTTP signals no matter what anyone else's opinion might be. >> >> syntactically invalid I understand. >> >> what do you mean by 'semantically invalid'? contradictory? or you believe I don't mean what I am saying? or something else? > > DNT:1 has a defined semantic. If it is sent by a client when that > semantic is not true, then it is an invalid use of HTTP. And which semantics can be ascertained to be true or not, remotely? I am genuinely curious. > > ....Roy > David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.
Received on Monday, 8 July 2013 17:11:03 UTC