- From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
- Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 15:23:05 -0700
- To: Jack Hobaugh <jack@networkadvertising.org>, Marc Groman <mgroman@networkadvertising.org>, Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net>, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>
- Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org List" <public-tracking@w3.org>
Colleagues, I am trying to understand the implications of you proposed definition of de-identified data. Could you please: 1. Explain how you definition differs from the June draft and the significance of the differences. In other words in what ways would a data set considered as de-identified by your definition not count as de-identified by the definition in the June draft. 2. Provide several in non-normative language some specific uses cases of what techniques would count as de-identified data under your definition and what would not? Regards, John
Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 22:23:35 UTC