W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-tracking@w3.org > July 2013

De-identifed data

From: John Simpson <john@consumerwatchdog.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 15:23:05 -0700
Message-Id: <CF9A8285-A245-4972-95A0-7E1E0680091B@consumerwatchdog.org>
Cc: "public-tracking@w3.org List" <public-tracking@w3.org>
To: Jack Hobaugh <jack@networkadvertising.org>, Marc Groman <mgroman@networkadvertising.org>, Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net>, Shane Wiley <wileys@yahoo-inc.com>

I am trying to understand the implications of you proposed definition of de-identified data.  Could you please:

1. Explain how you definition differs from the June draft and the significance of the differences.  In other words in what ways would a data set considered as de-identified by your definition not count as de-identified by the definition in the June draft.

2. Provide several in non-normative language some specific uses cases of what techniques would count as de-identified data under your definition and what would not?

Received on Thursday, 4 July 2013 22:23:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:39:52 UTC