- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:14:45 -0400
- To: Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net>
- Cc: Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net>, "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
On 2013-07-18, at 20:38 -0400, Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net> wrote: >> Also of note: "When the Chair believes that the Group has duly considered the legitimate concerns of dissenters as far as is possible and reasonable, the group should move on." > > I'm not advocating this decision, but by your standard the Chairs would have no choice but to "move on" from the entire June Draft given the group's collective dissent to it. The issues that exist in the June Draft have been debated for 18 months with little to no progress. For probably a dozen issues the group has "considered the legitimate concerns" of all sides to no resolution. The chairs have layed out a path to get to a conclusion, based on the June draft and the change proposals that are before the group. We're through the first decision in that path, pruning a piece of the decision tree that we're working through.
Received on Friday, 19 July 2013 14:14:44 UTC