RE: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses

Rigo,

If user profiles are not used or built then why the necessity for
singling-out? Why have we not been given a definitive reason for
collecting/using UIDs?

Making the text work is not the only option, we could just not agree to the
permitted use. The necessity for one has not been adequately justified.

Mike
 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rigo Wenning [mailto:rigo@w3.org] 
Sent: 23 July 2013 00:20
To: public-tracking@w3.org; rob@blaeu.com
Subject: Re: Change proposal: new general principle for permitted uses

Rob, 

before we take that on, we have to match Kathy's suggestion with Ronan's
interpretation. I have repeatedly asked whether audience measurement is used
to target users either by changing their view on the web or by allowing a
real time adaption of web content. 

I was always told, this is not the case and that sporting interpretations to
the contrary only engage those who are making them. 
This is why Kathy included the bit about the recognized QA mechanism by the
professional associations. 

If you have concerns about people giving misinterpretations to Kathy's text,
please indicate where those are. We can not lock down the practice of a
theoretic audience measurement company interpreting the text as a permission
to create user profiles under the permitted use of "audience measurement".
The only thing we can do is to make Kathy's text work. 

And it may also be clear that a far too creative interpretation of wording
from a potential compliance specification will not always be accepted by all
authorities. So before killing Shane's vision of one data store for
permitted uses that you treat respectfully, I want to make sure we are not
only talking past each other . 

 --Rigo

On Monday 22 July 2013 16:34:01 Rob van Eijk wrote:
> Peter,
> 
> I added a proposal for a new general principle for permitted uses to 
> the wiki:
> 
> The reason this is relevant, is the recent discussion on audience 
> measurement and frequency capping. An identifier set for one permitted 
> use is currently not prohibited to use for another permitted use.
> 
> 
> == New general principle for permitted uses ==
> 
> 
> 5.2.5 no matching/syncing between permitted uses
> 
> Data collected or retained by a party for a specific permitted use 
> must not be matched or synced with data from other permitted uses.
> 
> Disallowed Example: cookie syncing between permitted uses.

Received on Tuesday, 23 July 2013 07:11:19 UTC