- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 19:55:03 +0200
- To: Lauren Gelman <gelman@blurryedge.com>
- Cc: Mike Zaneis <mike@iab.net>, Alan Chapell <achapell@chapellassociates.com>, "public-tracking@w3.org" <public-tracking@w3.org>, Peter Swire <peter@peterswire.net>, "Matthias Schunter (Intel Corporation)" <mts-std@schunter.org>
\On 2013-07-22, at 19:39 +0200, Lauren Gelman <gelman@blurryedge.com> wrote: > In fairness, I think it's been pretty clear from the beginning that this was not going to be a "majority wins" or "tallying" exercise. Otherwise, there would have been a lot of incentive for parties to get the most similar minds to join W3C to raise their hands at the appropriate time. Indeed. I will also point out that this isn't the first time the group goes through this process.
Received on Monday, 22 July 2013 17:55:14 UTC